2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-year results from a Swedish study on conventional versus accelerated radiotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma – The ARTSCAN study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
34
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
34
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Patients were randomized to RT with conventional fractionation (2 Gy/day, 5 days/week for 7 weeks, total dose 68 Gy) versus accelerated fractionation (AF; 1.1 Gy+ 2 Gy/day, 5 days/week for 7 weeks, total dose 68 Gy). The 2-year results were previously published [6]. The 5-year results confirm the 2-year results with no difference in terms of OS and LRC between the two arms.…”
Section: Trials On Optimization Of Radiotherapy and Radiochemotherapysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Patients were randomized to RT with conventional fractionation (2 Gy/day, 5 days/week for 7 weeks, total dose 68 Gy) versus accelerated fractionation (AF; 1.1 Gy+ 2 Gy/day, 5 days/week for 7 weeks, total dose 68 Gy). The 2-year results were previously published [6]. The 5-year results confirm the 2-year results with no difference in terms of OS and LRC between the two arms.…”
Section: Trials On Optimization Of Radiotherapy and Radiochemotherapysupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Competing risks were: LRF (distant metastasis or death); LF (failures not including T-site or death); DSD (death in patients cured for the glottic cancer); Laryngectomy (death); NPT (death); OS and EFS (no competing events). Risk differences (RD) were estimated using the pseudo value approach [11]. RDs were presented as the percentage point lower risk after 6 fx/w compared to 5 fx/w.…”
Section: Statistics and Endpoint Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent sub-analyses revealed that ACC RT improved loco-regional control regardless of HPV/p16-status [4] and also improved loco-regional control in patients with high tumor expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor and well/moderate tumor differentiation [5]. A detailed analysis of treatment related morbidity demonstrated some increase in acute, but no increase in late morbidity in the ACC RT group [6,7] Though not all find an effect of acceleration [8][9][10][11], other studies have substantiated the positive effect of moderate ACC RT in head and neck SCC [12,13], but have often not included early stage and/-or glottic tumors [14,15]. The DAHANCA 6 study is, by far, the largest study specifically investigating the effect of moderate acceleration in glottic SCC patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in this field have been made with the help of vascular free flaps, however this has not improved the overall survival (Shah 2007 RT can be given in a variety of ways delivering different dosages once or twice daily. A lot of research has been focused on trying to optimize dosage plans resulting in accelerated fractionation, hyperfractionation (Horiot et al 1992;Zackrisson et al 2011), and intensitymodulating radiotherapy (Argiris et al 2008), however, the benefits of these treatments over conventional RT are still debatable (Peters 2007).…”
Section: Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%