2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Two-years static and dynamic monitoring of the Santa Maria di Collemaggio basilica

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The empirical correlations allow the estimation of the fundamental vibration period, including only geometric features, in agreement with the experimental data collected by [22,23]. The modal characteristics, such as modal shapes and frequencies, can be experimentally identified to characterize the current conditions of a structure [24][25][26][27], which is the base for the design of the strengthening and retrofitting interventions. Dynamic tests in Operational Conditions are reliable tools for non-destructively characterizing the linear dynamic of historical structures [28][29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The empirical correlations allow the estimation of the fundamental vibration period, including only geometric features, in agreement with the experimental data collected by [22,23]. The modal characteristics, such as modal shapes and frequencies, can be experimentally identified to characterize the current conditions of a structure [24][25][26][27], which is the base for the design of the strengthening and retrofitting interventions. Dynamic tests in Operational Conditions are reliable tools for non-destructively characterizing the linear dynamic of historical structures [28][29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Figure 6 shows the contour plot of the variance of the elastic modulus σ E c , given σ 2 f m and σ 2 N c , estimated from Equation (20). Interestingly, σ E c does not strongly depend on the confidence bounds of prestressing given a certain variance of the natural frequency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the 1970s, many researchers focused on structural dynamics as a possible way to estimate prestressing [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Vibration-based approaches have been proven successful for damage detection purposes in multiple theoretical analysis and case study analyses [19][20][21][22]. However, so far, none have made successful attempts in identifying the internal prestressing forces using vibration-based approaches.…”
Section: Dynamic-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vibration-based SHM methods based on unsupervised learning techniques have been recently demonstrated in the literature as eminently efficient for early-stage damage detection [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Due to their limitation to detection only, more advanced approaches are required in order to address higher levels of damage identification for Cultural Heritage (CH) masonry structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%