2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tying product reuse into tying arrangements to achieve competitive advantage and environmental improvement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing research in the field of circular business model underlines that take‐back systems enable the acquisition of wastes as resources, although they need to be incentivized by proposing to customers a lower waste management cost (Ranta et al, ). As Lewandowski () pointed out, take‐back systems gain relevance in a circular economy because this approach “assumes that products, their components and/or materials can be cascaded (in case of biological nutrients), and reused/redistributed, remanufactured/refurbished, or recycled (in case of technical nutrients)” (p. 20); thus, companies are required to collect back products from the consumer (Krystofik & Gaustad, ). Take‐back systems require the design of the take‐back management system including channels and customer relations related to this system (Lewandowski, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing research in the field of circular business model underlines that take‐back systems enable the acquisition of wastes as resources, although they need to be incentivized by proposing to customers a lower waste management cost (Ranta et al, ). As Lewandowski () pointed out, take‐back systems gain relevance in a circular economy because this approach “assumes that products, their components and/or materials can be cascaded (in case of biological nutrients), and reused/redistributed, remanufactured/refurbished, or recycled (in case of technical nutrients)” (p. 20); thus, companies are required to collect back products from the consumer (Krystofik & Gaustad, ). Take‐back systems require the design of the take‐back management system including channels and customer relations related to this system (Lewandowski, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yang, Lu, Zhu, & Su, 2015;Lu Zhang, Li, Cao, & Huang, 2018). However, few papers focus on B-to-B context based on large customer and stakeholders' criteria selection (Krysto & Gaustad, 2018;Li, Ye, Sheu, & Yang, 2018;Saberi, Cruz, Sarkis, & Nagurney, 2018;Wang, Wang, Zhang, & Zhao, 2018;Yu, Cruz, & Michelle, 2018;Linghong Zhang, Zhou, Liu, & Lu, 2019). This can be explained by the fact that firms are reluctant to share information, which makes data collection difficult.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Innovative competitive strategies are associated with a diverse set of CE practices, such as waste sorting systems, design, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), recovery and reuse of packaging, innovative materials for packaging (Mura et al, 2020), and product reuse and remanufacturing (Krystofik & Gaustad, 2018). Each of those CE practices are paths to implement different competitive strategies.…”
Section: State‐of‐the‐art Of Strategic Planning In Cementioning
confidence: 99%