2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000250318.31453.cb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tympanic temperature measurements: Are they reliable in the critically ill? A clinical study of measures of agreement*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
62
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…First, it was not possible to blind treating paramedics and in-hospital medical staff to treatment allocation; however, the intensive care of post-cardiac arrest patients by attending medical staff followed standard guidelines, and it is unlikely that prehospital temperature management influenced major decisions by physicians after admission to the hospital. Second, measurement of tympanic temperature may be inferior to some other methods of measurement of core temperature, such as esophageal, bladder, or pulmonary artery temperature 19 ; however, additional funding for the provision of equipment and training for esophageal temperature measurement was not available in our EMS. Also, the present study was terminated before the enrollment of the estimated required sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, it was not possible to blind treating paramedics and in-hospital medical staff to treatment allocation; however, the intensive care of post-cardiac arrest patients by attending medical staff followed standard guidelines, and it is unlikely that prehospital temperature management influenced major decisions by physicians after admission to the hospital. Second, measurement of tympanic temperature may be inferior to some other methods of measurement of core temperature, such as esophageal, bladder, or pulmonary artery temperature 19 ; however, additional funding for the provision of equipment and training for esophageal temperature measurement was not available in our EMS. Also, the present study was terminated before the enrollment of the estimated required sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 Tympanic temperature had a large variation and lacked correlation (coefficient 0.1) with intrauterine temperature in the study of Banerjee et al 8 Poor correlation of tympanic temperature with core temperature was described in other studies. [36][37][38] Although rectal measurement has some inconvenience, we decided on this method as it is generally considered to be gold standard for clinical temperature measurement. 23,35,37 Conclusions At the beginning of labour, temperature was 37.1°C (2SD 0.7).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a prospective cohort study, we included all women with a singleton live pregnancy and a gestational age of 36 We excluded women with a planned caesarean section, an immediate indication for delivery or full cervical dilatation on admission, and those with an infant in breech presentation or with a lethal congenital abnormality. Neonatal observation or treatment during the first week after birth was recorded.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, when noninvasive infrared thermometers were introduced, a plethora of studies was published reporting comparisons of body temperature values when measured simultaneously with the infrared thermometer and such established thermal sensors as the pulmonary artery catheter. [1][2][3][4][5] Other examples of method-comparisons include arterial pulse contour versus pulmonary artery thermodilution cardiac output and point-of-care versus laboratory testing of blood glucose levels. [6][7][8] The basic indication for a method-comparison study is the need to determine if two methods for measuring the same thing (e.g., body temperature, cardiac output) do so in an equivalent manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%