2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-5876(00)00367-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tympanometry and acoustic reflectometry in ears with chronic retraction without effusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fishpool et al [16], for example, have shown that tympanometry has a 27% false negative rate (unable to detect cases with true OME) in children with confirmed OME using myringotomy and a 16% false positive rate (incorrectly identifying cases as having OME); these findings have been confirmed by several investigators [17,18]. This is in agreement with tympanometric findings reported previously for older children with DS [19].…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…Fishpool et al [16], for example, have shown that tympanometry has a 27% false negative rate (unable to detect cases with true OME) in children with confirmed OME using myringotomy and a 16% false positive rate (incorrectly identifying cases as having OME); these findings have been confirmed by several investigators [17,18]. This is in agreement with tympanometric findings reported previously for older children with DS [19].…”
supporting
confidence: 74%
“…In Syed et al the common sign seen by otoscopic examination was dull eardrum (72.18%), while in our study the commonest was retraction of tympanic membrane [15]. The most common type of tympanometry results seen among children with OME in our study was type B (92%), Kemaloğlu et al [27] and Pan et al [28] reported that B-type tympanogram positive predictive values were 96% and 92.57% respectively. The overall diagnostic accuracy of type B tympanogram for predicting middle ear effusion was 100% in the group with parental suspicion of hearing loss giving a sensitivity of 100%, which was higher than the group whose parents were not suspicious of hearing loss.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 44%
“…Meanwhile, most cases showed mild degree of hearing loss (54.8%). Thompson in 2008, Martines et al in 2010 and 2011 revealed that the worse conductive hearing loss among children with OME was of moderate degree, which constitute up to 10% compared with 20-35% having mild degree hearing loss [15,27,31]. These results suggests that the degree of conductive hearing loss among cases with OME cannot be worse than a moderate hearing loss as the skull vibrate at intensities greater than 60-70 dB hearing level allowing the signal to go straight to the inner ear; anything greater than this is considered to be mixed hearing loss [31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By anatomical microscopy (Leica S6D), OM was detected in mice as young as 11 days old ( Figure 1B ). The mutant mice showed severe middle ear effusion, sometimes accompanied by tympanic membrane retraction ( Figure 1D ) resembling human OM pathology [35], [36]. OM was detected in all mutant mice over 11 days of age, in contrast to the wild-type control mice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%