2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type I Interferon Delivery by iPSC-Derived Myeloid Cells Elicits Antitumor Immunity via XCR1+ Dendritic Cells

Abstract: Highlights d IFN-a-iPSC-pMCs propagate the type I ISG signature in tumor microenvironments d IFN-a from iPSC-pMCs enhances antitumor T cell responses via XCR1 + DCs d Systemic antitumor efficacy depends on CXCR3, but not on the STING pathway d IFN-a-iPSC-pMC treatment enhances the response to PD-1/ PD-L1 blockade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An important issue related to the clinical use of IFNs is toxicity and adverse events. Although approved in 1986 by the FDA for the treatment of malignancies and viral disorders, with demonstrated positive disease outcomes, IFNa is currently not commonly used in cancer treatment due to adverse effects (36,37). A pilot study looked at the potential of decreasing the dose of IFN-a2b for the treatment of melanoma over the course of an 11-month treatment period.…”
Section: Canonical and Non-canonical Ifn Signaling In Malignanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An important issue related to the clinical use of IFNs is toxicity and adverse events. Although approved in 1986 by the FDA for the treatment of malignancies and viral disorders, with demonstrated positive disease outcomes, IFNa is currently not commonly used in cancer treatment due to adverse effects (36,37). A pilot study looked at the potential of decreasing the dose of IFN-a2b for the treatment of melanoma over the course of an 11-month treatment period.…”
Section: Canonical and Non-canonical Ifn Signaling In Malignanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tsuchiya et al genetically engineered induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived proliferation myeloid cells (iPSC-pMCs) to produce IFNa. When injected into mice, these IFN-producing iPSC-pMCs exerted immunomodulatory effects analogous to direct type I IFN administration, yet without adverse effects or hematopoietic stem cell exhaustion (37). Brown et al studied recombinant poliovirus/rhinovirus chimera PVSRIPO effects in cancer immunosuppression and found PVSRIPO infection of DCs increased IFNb production and a sustained type I IFN response, as indicated by p-STAT1 and ISG induction (IFIT1, ISG15) (34).…”
Section: Canonical and Non-canonical Ifn Signaling In Malignanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides direct targeting approaches, endogenous cDC1 populations could be indirectly modulated by other cell-based immunotherapies. In accordance with this, the administration of IFNα-producing iPSC-derived proliferating myeloid cells (pMCs) to mice strongly activated host CD141 + XCR1 + DCs, enhancing their CD8 + T cell priming capacity and thus boosting anti-tumor immune responses [120]. Furthermore, IFN-α-iPSC-pMCs administered in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors overcame resistance to single-dose administrations, leading to longer lasting anti-tumor immunity, shedding light on the advantages that may arise from treatment combination [120].…”
Section: Exploiting Cdc1 In Cancer Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…In accordance with this, the administration of IFNα-producing iPSC-derived proliferating myeloid cells (pMCs) to mice strongly activated host CD141 + XCR1 + DCs, enhancing their CD8 + T cell priming capacity and thus boosting anti-tumor immune responses [120]. Furthermore, IFN-α-iPSC-pMCs administered in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors overcame resistance to single-dose administrations, leading to longer lasting anti-tumor immunity, shedding light on the advantages that may arise from treatment combination [120]. On the other hand, allogenic T cells were recently reported to be able to act as migratory transporters, delivering antigens to resident XCR1 + DCs in secondary lymphoid organs [121].…”
Section: Exploiting Cdc1 In Cancer Immunotherapymentioning
confidence: 74%
“…36 Nevertheless, although the frequency of the mutant Adpgk allele in the MC38 cancer used in this study was approximately 30%, the transplanted MC38 cancer was completely suppressed in combination therapies in some mice. 45 This may be due to the successful elimination of cancer, triggered by an "epitope spreading". 46 Only a single T cell epitope targeting a single cancer antigen was used in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%