2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2005.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Type IIB string theory, S-duality, and generalized cohomology

Abstract: In the presence of background Neveu-Schwarz flux, the description of the Ramond-Ramond fields of type IIB string theory using twisted K-theory is not compatible with S-duality. We argue that other possible variants of twisted K-theory would still not resolve this issue. We propose instead a connection of S-duality with elliptic cohomology, and a possible T-duality relation of this to a previous proposal for IIA theory, and higher-dimensional limits. In the process, we obtain some other results which may be int… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
76
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

7
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(127 reference statements)
3
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above bundle description, however, gives an alternative point of view where the NSNS fields seem to be the fields twisted by (part of) the RR fields. Furthermore, this provides some further justification -at least morally -for the proposal in [13] for treating the NSNS field H 3 and the RR field F 3 , in type IIB string theory, democratically, that is, untwist the NSNS twist and view both fields as untwisted elements of elliptic cohomology. In the current context, it is even more because the twist is done by the RR field F 4 , representing the E 8 bundle, and what is being twisted is the NSNS field H 3 , representing the LE 8 -bundle.…”
Section: Twist Versus Twisted Based Versus Unbasedmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The above bundle description, however, gives an alternative point of view where the NSNS fields seem to be the fields twisted by (part of) the RR fields. Furthermore, this provides some further justification -at least morally -for the proposal in [13] for treating the NSNS field H 3 and the RR field F 3 , in type IIB string theory, democratically, that is, untwist the NSNS twist and view both fields as untwisted elements of elliptic cohomology. In the current context, it is even more because the twist is done by the RR field F 4 , representing the E 8 bundle, and what is being twisted is the NSNS field H 3 , representing the LE 8 -bundle.…”
Section: Twist Versus Twisted Based Versus Unbasedmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…At the level of representations, the Higgs field will then take values in the corresponding Ωe 8 bundle. 13 From the point of view of the gauge theory on the S 1 fiber the space of gauge orbits is the classifying space BG 0 = A/G 0 , i.e., the quotient of the space of connections A by the based gauge transformations G 0 . The group of gauge transformations is just ΩE 8 and so the space of equivalence classes is just E 8 .…”
Section: The Higgs Field and The Reduction Of The Le 8 To Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the twisted case [7], i.e. in the presence of the NSNS field H 3 , the twisted K-theoretic description is discussed in [7] for type IIA, and an S-duality covariant description for type IIB using generalized cohomology refinements was proposed in [2]. For M-theory, in [8,9,10], a higher degree analog of K-theory was proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, an S-duality covariant approach to describe the fields of type IIB string theory was proposed in [2,3]. In studying modularity in [3], the elliptic curve of elliptic cohomology was given another interpretation, namely as corresponding to the fiber of F-theory over type IIB string theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [39] this was studied starting from the conjecture in [4], proven in [19], that in the absence of D3-brane charge…”
Section: Open Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%