2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1571-0661(04)00309-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Typed behavioural equivalences for processes in the presence of subtyping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following [15], the (If) rule exploits the equality between u and v to refine the types of the two values in the typing for the then branch. The notation Γ u : V indicates the environment Γ, u :…”
Section: The Type Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following [15], the (If) rule exploits the equality between u and v to refine the types of the two values in the typing for the then branch. The notation Γ u : V indicates the environment Γ, u :…”
Section: The Type Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bound names in output labels denote scope extruded names whereas bound names in input labels denote fresh names introduced by the (implicit) observer. These three transitions are defined inductively by the rules given in Table 7 and Table 8, inspired by [9,8,4], but with a number of differences.…”
Section: Action (ñ :T)l : A?(v)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Syntax synchronous 1 , monadic, calculus with the match/mismatch operator. As explained in [12], the matching construct is essential for the coinductive characterization of the reduction barbed congruence shown in Section 3.…”
Section: The Languagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We define typed equivalences for the π-calculus relative to an observation level σ, namely σ-reduction barbed congruences (see [12]). Two processes P, Q are σ-equivalent in the type environment Γ , written Γ P ∼ =σ Q, if they exhibit the same σ-level behaviour, i.e., they are indistinguishable for a σ-level observer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%