Types and anatomical locations of injuries among mountain bikers and hikers: A systematic review

Abstract

Background Mountain biking and hiking continue to grow in popularity. With new participants to these sports, it is likely the number of injuries will increase. To assist medical personnel in the management of these patients we attempted to quantify the types and locations of injuries sustained by mountain bikers and hikers. Objective The objective of this systematic review is to identify the type and anatomical location of injuries for both mountain bikers and hikers. Methods A systematic search was undertaken using CINAHL, Cochrane, ProQuest, PubMed and Scopus databases. Reviewers assessed the eligibility of articles by a title/abstract review and final full-text review. Studies were included if the types of injuries were reported by medical personnel and contained anatomical locations. Studies were excluded if it did not take place on a trail or if the injuries were self-reported. Risk of bias was assessed utilising the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) checklists for study quality. No meta-analysis or comparison between mountain bikers and hikers was possible due to the high heterogeneity of the definition of injury. Results A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, 17 covering mountain biking and 7 hiking. This represented 220,935 injured mountain bikers and 17,757 injured hikers. The most common type of injuries sustained by mountain bikers included contusions, abrasions and minor lacerations, which made up between 45–74% of reported injuries in studies on competitive racing and 8–67% in non-competitive studies. Fractures represented between 1.5–43% of all reported injuries. The most injured region was the upper limbs reported in 10 of 17 studies. For hikers the most common injuries included blisters and ankle sprains with blisters representing 8–33% of all reported injuries. The most common body location to be injured by hikers was a lower limb in all 7 studies. Conclusions This is the first systematic review to report on the injury epidemiology of the two most common trail users; mountain bikers and hikers. For participants in both activities the majority of injuries were of minor severity. Despite this, the high proportions of upper limb fractures in mountain bikers and ankle sprains in hikers cannot be ignored. Trial registration Registration: This systematic review was prospectively registered with the University of York PROSPERO database on the 12/4/2021 (CRD42021229623) https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021229623.

Effects of Hiking-Dependent Walking Speeds and Slopes on Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters and Ground Reaction Forces: A Treadmill-Based Analysis in Healthy Young Adults

“…Understanding ground reaction force and GRF patterns may also facilitate the implementation of intervention programs to improve weight distribution and reduce joint stress, thus alleviating asymmetries or excessive joint loading. This would be particularly important in the prevention of musculoskeletal injuries resulting from frequent and prolonged walking on various surfaces, such as blisters [67] and ankle sprains [68]. Likewise, COP data may allow for the design of exercises that specifically target balance deficits and enhance overall stability.…”

A systematic review protocol of injuries and illness across all the competitive cycling disciplines, including track cycling, mountain biking, road cycling, time trial, cyclocross, gravel cycling, BMX freestyle, BMX racing, e-sport, para-cycling and artistic cycling

“…[5] Studies have shown that cyclists are not immune to injury or illness. [2,[17][18][19][20][21] The range of injuries and illnesses that do occur is vast, however, the reporting of injuries varies signi cantly with a signi cant lack of homogeneity between studies and disciplines. [2,4] Injury and Illness surveillance studies in other sports are far more advanced and have seen the development of speci c warm-up routines to reduce injury risk such as FIFA 11 [22]in soccer, and Gaelic Athletic Association (GAA) 15 [23] in Gaelic games.…”