Idempotency 1998
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511662508.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Types and dynamics in partially additive categories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [17], we showed that GoI situations with a special class of traced monoidal categories, known as unique decomposition categories as the underlying category, completely capture Girard's GoI 1 in [11]. It should be noted that Mascari and Pedicini [28] have also used partially additive categories (special case of unique decomposition categories) in their study of GoI. The present and previous work by the author is independent of [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [17], we showed that GoI situations with a special class of traced monoidal categories, known as unique decomposition categories as the underlying category, completely capture Girard's GoI 1 in [11]. It should be noted that Mascari and Pedicini [28] have also used partially additive categories (special case of unique decomposition categories) in their study of GoI. The present and previous work by the author is independent of [28].…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…It should be noted that Mascari and Pedicini [28] have also used partially additive categories (special case of unique decomposition categories) in their study of GoI. The present and previous work by the author is independent of [28]. This paper is motivated by the work in [10] and thus we shall give a brief account on the motivations for the work in [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…One purpose has been to provide a bridge between operational and denotational semantics. In this context we recall the work in Abramsky et al [1994] on full abstraction, which also gave rise to the study of game semantics for programming languages, and the work in Mascari and Pedicini [1998] on partially additive categories, recently extended by Haghverdi and Scott [2004] to cope with the traced monoidal categories originally proposed • M. Pedicini and F. Quaglia by Joyal et al [1996]. Another purpose has been constructing operational semantics for classical logic in Laurent [2001], successively addressed by Führmann and Pym [2004] through also using traced monoidal categories.…”
Section: Algebraic Setting For the Geometry Of Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%