1990
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-52592-0_53
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Types in lambda calculi and programming languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is still true if we allow recursive types, as in the λµ-calculus [2]. Proo: This is also proved in [21].…”
Section: Comparison With Type Inference Resultmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This is still true if we allow recursive types, as in the λµ-calculus [2]. Proo: This is also proved in [21].…”
Section: Comparison With Type Inference Resultmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The results are still valid if we allow recursive types, as in the λµ-calculus [1]. Here the TI constraints are exactly the same, but the type schemes are changed from finite to regular trees.…”
Section: Theorem 59mentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In our proofs we also use the (generation) Lemma 5.2.13 described in [2]. The (cut) rule is obtained taking ∆ ≡ in Sbs:…”
Section: Lemma 2 (Elementary Properties)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pure Type Systems (PTS) [1,2] provide a flexible and general framework to study dependent type system properties. Moreover, PTS also include many interesting systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%