2015
DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2015.1100292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Types of cooperation partners as determinants of innovation failures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
6

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
24
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…cooperation failures) (Lhuillery & Pfister, 2009). This is supported by the study of Hyll and Pippel (2016). As a result of the 'problems' highlighted in connection with involving competitors, the following hypothesis is put forward: H2: The involvement of competitors increases the likelihood of firms deciding to abandon innovation projects.…”
Section: Involvement Of External Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…cooperation failures) (Lhuillery & Pfister, 2009). This is supported by the study of Hyll and Pippel (2016). As a result of the 'problems' highlighted in connection with involving competitors, the following hypothesis is put forward: H2: The involvement of competitors increases the likelihood of firms deciding to abandon innovation projects.…”
Section: Involvement Of External Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Current literature on abandoned innovation projects is somewhat limited and the focus is mainly either on why firms abandon projects (Galia & Legros, 2004;Garcia-Vega & Lopez, 2010) or on the type of firms abandoning projects (Paunov, 2012). Furthermore, the number of studies on the relationship between external sources and abandoned innovation projects are limited (Hyll & Pippel, 2016). The explanation usually given for these abandoned innovation projects is that there are problems in the partnership between the firm and the external sources (Lhuillery & Pfister, 2009), or in the type of external partners used (Hyll & Pippel, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the firm level, competitors can decide to collaborate for innovation in order to influence standard setting or the regulatory environment, learn more about their rivals' competencies, and, finally, solve common problems outside the realms of competition (Tether, ; Yami & Nemeh, ). Empirically, several papers investigated the impact of cooperation with non‐rival and rival entities (coopetition) on innovation activities (e.g., Aschhoff & Schmidt, ; De Faria et al, ; Estrada, Faems, & de Faria, ; Hyll & Pippel, ; Le Roy et al, ; Neyens, Faems, & Sels, ; Nieto & Santamaria, ; Quintana‐Garcia & Benavides‐Velasco, ; Santamaria & Surroca, ; Tomlinson, ). The results of these studies will not be detailed here, as our focus is on the effect of coopetition on economic performance for which the main studies are overviewed in the paragraph below.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Concept Of Coopetition Related Litementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nesse cenário, as organizações podem se tornar mais competitivas, pois o investimento em novos processos estimula novas ideias a fim de criar um cenário propício à inovação (Hyll & Pippel, 2016). Conforme o Manual de Oslo (2007), visa-se a melhoria do processo de produção, bem com a eficiência na entrega do produto, os quais necessitam de investimentos por parte da organização, que em contrapartida aumenta a performance organizacional (Jeng & Pak, 2014).…”
Section: Processos De Inovação Do Serviço De Saúdeunclassified