1939
DOI: 10.1086/218263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Types of Power and Status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
92
0
1

Year Published

1973
1973
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
92
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, though power and status are distinct constructs (Emerson, 1962;Fiske, 2010;Goldhamer & Shils, 1939;Hall et al, 2005;Henrich & Gil-White, 2001;Ridgeway & Walker, 1995;Sachdev & Bourhis, 1985) in real world settings it is likely that power and status will be highly correlated McGuire, Brammer, & Raleigh, 1986).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, though power and status are distinct constructs (Emerson, 1962;Fiske, 2010;Goldhamer & Shils, 1939;Hall et al, 2005;Henrich & Gil-White, 2001;Ridgeway & Walker, 1995;Sachdev & Bourhis, 1985) in real world settings it is likely that power and status will be highly correlated McGuire, Brammer, & Raleigh, 1986).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A primary and consistent predictor of status in groups is perceived competence (e.g., Berger et al, 1972;Driskell & Mullen, 1990;Lord, de Vader, & Alliger, 1986). In general, groups confer higher status on individuals who exhibit abilities that help the group succeed (Berger et al, 1972;Eibl-Eibesfeldt, 1989;Emerson, 1962;Goldhamer & Shils, 1939). Because competent individuals can provide important contributions to the group's success, they tend to be given higher status.…”
Section: The Status-enhancement Theory Of Overconfidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, individuals who occupy high-power positions but are not perceived as powerful risk their position being viewed as illegitimate . While some behaviors signaling power may be difficult to enact with limited resources (e.g., loaning money, exerting influence, taking action; Goldhamer & Shils, 1939), others may be relatively easy to adopt (e.g., a lower-pitched voice; Carney, ).…”
Section: Abstract Language Signals Power 2 Abstractmentioning
confidence: 99%