2019
DOI: 10.1101/791665
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TypeTE: a tool to genotype mobile element insertions from whole genome resequencing data

Abstract: Alu retrotransposons account for more than 10% of the human genome, and insertions of these elements create structural variants segregating in human populations. Such polymorphic Alu are powerful markers to understand population structure, and they represent variants that can greatly impact genome function, including gene expression. Accurate genotyping of Alu and other mobile elements has been challenging. Indeed, we found that Alu genotypes previously called for the 1000 Genomes Project are sometimes erroneo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(98 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are at least four important methodological differences that could account for the discrepancies between the two studies. First and foremost, our analysis considered 860 reference TEs never analysed before, presumably because their genotypes could not be confidently predicted [31]. Second, we used improved genotypes recalled by TypeTE [31], while Wang et al used the genotypes as originally called by Sudmant et al [12].…”
Section: (A) Mapping Cis-te-eqtl In Lcl and Ipscmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are at least four important methodological differences that could account for the discrepancies between the two studies. First and foremost, our analysis considered 860 reference TEs never analysed before, presumably because their genotypes could not be confidently predicted [31]. Second, we used improved genotypes recalled by TypeTE [31], while Wang et al used the genotypes as originally called by Sudmant et al [12].…”
Section: (A) Mapping Cis-te-eqtl In Lcl and Ipscmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though the overall performance of MELT outperformed existing MEI discovery tools (Gardner et al 2017) and it has been successfully used in several large-scale studies (Gardner et al 2017, 2019; Feusier et al 2019; Werling et al 2018; Torene et al 2020), but the detection power could be compromised by modest sequencing depth and incompetence in complex genomic regions of short-read WGS etc . In addition, the overall genotyping accuracy by MELT v2 was 87.95% for non-reference Alu s (not excluding MEIs in low complexity regions), when compared with PCR generated genotypes (Goubert et al 2020). As such, we have tried to ensure the site quality by strict filtering.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mapping quality [56] greater than 20 was required in both cases. This approach facilitated targeted analysis of user-defined integrations and reduced computational burden by first aligning to a limited reference sequence set rather than the entire genome, as in other recent analogous approaches [57,58].…”
Section: Bioinformatic Detection Of Alve Integration Sitesmentioning
confidence: 99%