1981
DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(81)90086-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Typical cerebral hemisphere disconnection deficits following corpus callosum section despite sparing of the anterior commissure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern is also found when comparing the performance before and after the surgery in the same patients (e.g., Musiek, Kibbe, & Baran, 1984;Musiek, Wilson, & Pinheiro, 1979;Risse, LeDoux, Springer, Wilson, & Gazzaniga, 1978;Sidtis, Volpe, Wilson, Rayport, & Gazzaniga, 1981). Furthermore, and in line with the topographical organisation of the corpus callosum (e.g., Fabri & Polonara, 2023;Schmahmann & Pandya, 2006), partial sections of the corpus callosum appeared to be sufficient to evoke the left-ear extinction, as long as the posterior third of the corpus callosum is affected (McKeever, Sullivan, Ferguson, & Rayport, 1981;Musiek et al, 1984;Musiek, Reeves, & Baran, 1985). Thus, studies on callosotomy patients supported the notion that specifically the ability to recall the left-ear stimulus in dichotic listening relies on the posterior corpus callosum.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This pattern is also found when comparing the performance before and after the surgery in the same patients (e.g., Musiek, Kibbe, & Baran, 1984;Musiek, Wilson, & Pinheiro, 1979;Risse, LeDoux, Springer, Wilson, & Gazzaniga, 1978;Sidtis, Volpe, Wilson, Rayport, & Gazzaniga, 1981). Furthermore, and in line with the topographical organisation of the corpus callosum (e.g., Fabri & Polonara, 2023;Schmahmann & Pandya, 2006), partial sections of the corpus callosum appeared to be sufficient to evoke the left-ear extinction, as long as the posterior third of the corpus callosum is affected (McKeever, Sullivan, Ferguson, & Rayport, 1981;Musiek et al, 1984;Musiek, Reeves, & Baran, 1985). Thus, studies on callosotomy patients supported the notion that specifically the ability to recall the left-ear stimulus in dichotic listening relies on the posterior corpus callosum.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…However, the AC is found to be enlarged in only 10% of cases with callosal agenesis, and it is entirely absent in another 10% 50. In callosotomy cases, it is unclear whether presence of an intact AC is associated with milder deficits,18 or not 19. On this basis, it would have been expected that the PAX6 patients would exhibit only mild auditory abnormalities, as the CC was present (reduced in size in only three patients) and the AC would be expected to be of lesser importance in auditory interhemispheric transfer, because of its significantly smaller size,7 but also because it contains fibers originating from less differentiated cortical areas 36.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In “split brain” cases, left ear performance in dichotic speech tasks is reduced to near extinction17; performance in both ears for monaural tasks requiring interhemispheric transfer is severely reduced,17, 18 but performance in auditory tasks not requiring such transfer is normal 17. It is not clear whether the presence of an intact anterior commisure in callosotomy cases is associated with milder auditory deficits19 or not,20 or whether hypertrophy of the anterior commisure in cases with corpus callosum agenesis enables functional compensation 21…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more obvious candidate for visual transfer in callosal agenesis is the anterior commissure, known to play a role in interhemispheric visual transfer of shape discrimination in the monkey (e.g., Noble, 1968; Sullivan & Hamilton, 1973a, 1973b) and chimpanzee (Black & Myers, 1964). Curiously, though, there is little evidence from comparisons of commissurotomized people with and without surgical section of the anterior commissure that the anterior commissure plays any significant role in vision in the human brain (Holtzman, 1984; McKeever, Sullivan,Ferguson, & Rayport, 1981). It has been suggested that the anterior commissure is enlarged in the acallosal brain relative to the normal brain, but the evidence suggests that this is true in only about 10% of cases of callosal agenesis and that there is a further 10% in which the anterior commissure is too small or lacking altogether (Rauch & Jinkins, 1994).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%