2014
DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.183.2.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Typification of two Linnaean names: Centaurea aspera and Centaurea isnardii (Asteraceae)

Abstract: The typification of the names Centaurea aspera L. and C. isnardii L. (Asteraceae) is discussed. A lectotype for C. aspera is designated from original material conserved in UPS-BURSER (Joachim Burser Herbarium). Centaurea isnardii is typified by an illustration of Isnard (1719) confirming this name as a synonym of C. aspera subsp. aspera.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In an attempt to relentlessly typify a number of Linnaean names Ferrer‐Gallego & Altınordu (2016: 131) chose to lectotypify the name Centaurea behen , apparently unaware of Negaresh & Rahaminejad's ineffective neotypification. At first sight Ferrer‐Gallego & Altınordu's lectotypification appears to have been a typification of the name based upon a choice between two original elements provided by Linnaeus (1753: 914) represented by woodcut illustrations (Rauwolf, 1583: t. 288 – Fig.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In an attempt to relentlessly typify a number of Linnaean names Ferrer‐Gallego & Altınordu (2016: 131) chose to lectotypify the name Centaurea behen , apparently unaware of Negaresh & Rahaminejad's ineffective neotypification. At first sight Ferrer‐Gallego & Altınordu's lectotypification appears to have been a typification of the name based upon a choice between two original elements provided by Linnaeus (1753: 914) represented by woodcut illustrations (Rauwolf, 1583: t. 288 – Fig.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). Ferrer‐Gallego & Altınordu (2016: 131) lectotypified the name based upon Rauwolf's woodcut illustration. The first author of the present article considers this problematic, and their interpretation based upon a false premise that the illustration ‘match[es] Linnaeus's description … and it agrees with the traditional and current usage of the name.’ Unfortunately, critical characters are absent from their diagnosis, and what is now known as Klasea cerinthifolia was clearly not considered in the melée.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sheet bears two fragments with leaves and inflorescences, and is labeled “Jacea cyanoides, echinato capite Bauh./Jacea major Lob./Monspelii”. None of the fragments on this sheet belong to V. muricata , and this specimen was designated by Ferrer‐Gallego et al () as the lectotype of the Linnaean name C. aspera (Iamonico and Peruzzi ).…”
Section: Centaurea Muricata L (1753 P 918) and Volutaria Muricata mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Linnaeus himself published 69 names at the rank of species in the genus Centaurea and 21 names at the rank of species or variety in the genus Serratula (Jarvis ). Continuing our nomenclatural study of the Centaurea names (Ferrer‐Gallego et al , , , Altınordu and Ferrer‐Gallego , Altınordu , Ferrer‐Gallego and Altınordu ), this paper deals with the designation of four untypified Linnaean names, Centaurea lippii, C. muricata, C. repens and Serratula babylonica . The names C. lippi and C. muricata are currently accepted in the genus Volutaria Cass.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%