2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45413-6_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Typing Lambda Terms in Elementary Logic with Linear Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We use a natural deduction presentation of the type-assignment system in the lines of [7,8] (it can also be presented in a sequent calculus style as in [1,3]). This formulation is not as well adapted as that of proof-nets [2,14] to the study of reduction, but it is easier to understand for typing.…”
Section: Type Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We use a natural deduction presentation of the type-assignment system in the lines of [7,8] (it can also be presented in a sequent calculus style as in [1,3]). This formulation is not as well adapted as that of proof-nets [2,14] to the study of reduction, but it is easier to understand for typing.…”
Section: Type Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coppola and Martini studied in [8] type inference in Elementary Affine Logic (EAL), a system corresponding to Kalmar elementary complexity (see also [10]), for which they showed decidability of type inference. Their algorithm was based on the idea of first proposing a simple type derivation for the term and then interpolating this derivation with modality rules in order to find a suitable EAL derivation (in the line of the works on linear decorations as [11]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A notion of typability for lambda calculus has been defined in [10,11,7] for EAL, and in [4] for LAL. Type inference has been proved to be decidable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After their introduction, they have been shown to be relevant for optimal reduction [5,6], programming language design [4,7] and set theory [8]. However, proof languages for these logics, designed through the Curry-Howard Correspondence, are syntactically quite complex and can hardly be proposed as programming languages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%