1999
DOI: 10.1159/000024953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Typing of Hepatitis C Virus by a New Method Based on Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism

Abstract: A new restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis has been developed for hepatitis C virus (HCV) typing in the viral 5′ non-coding region and contiguous core region. These genomic sequences were chosen for the relative nucleotide homology among different genotypes and for the presence of polymorphic sites. By employing two endonucleases (AccI and MboI) and, in some instances, a third one (EcoRII), we can unambiguously and reproducibly distinguish between genotypes and subtypes 1a, 1b, 1c, 2a, 2c, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several alternative HCV typing procedures have therefore been suggested, usually based on the analysis of PCR products by hybridization with genotype-specific probes [Stuyver et al, 1996;Viazov et al, 1997], or restriction length polymorphism [Thiers et al, 1997;Buoro et al, 1999].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several alternative HCV typing procedures have therefore been suggested, usually based on the analysis of PCR products by hybridization with genotype-specific probes [Stuyver et al, 1996;Viazov et al, 1997], or restriction length polymorphism [Thiers et al, 1997;Buoro et al, 1999].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitations of the test INNOLiPA are well known, especially concerning its inability to correctly discriminate the subtypes 2a and 2c of the genotype 2 and subtype 1c of genotype 1, as demonstrated using a restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis [32]. Anyway, its degree of specificity is similar to that of RFLP analysis and, as previously reported, comparable to that of the direct sequencing test Trugene, with an accuracy of 76 and 74%, respectively, even though the INNOLiPA confirms its less subtype discriminating power in subtyping genotype 2 [33,34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible to further distinguish the variants, using a third restriction enzyme (MboI), into genotypes 6a and 3a. 31 Unfortunately, we did not perform these additional tests. We were not able to determine the final result for genotype in specimens 1B, 3B, and 4A (not determined).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%