2006
DOI: 10.1128/jcm.00048-06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Typing of Human Adenoviruses in Specimens from Immunosuppressed Patients by PCR-Fragment Length Analysis and Real-Time Quantitative PCR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As seen in other studies (5,9), serotype 2 was the most common isolate. Like Ebner et al (5), we identified serotype 31 without another accompanying serotype (patient 5).…”
Section: Adenovirus (Adv) Infections Are Common In Childhoodsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…As seen in other studies (5,9), serotype 2 was the most common isolate. Like Ebner et al (5), we identified serotype 31 without another accompanying serotype (patient 5).…”
Section: Adenovirus (Adv) Infections Are Common In Childhoodsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These results suggested that the PCR/RFLP method described in this paper could be a useful screening approach for AdV detection and at the same time for AdV species typing, using a single restriction enzyme, HaeIII, in contrast to others RFLP strategies which have been used to identify adenoviruses serotypes or species by using several restriction enzymes (Li et al 1999, Elnifro et al 2000, Allard et al 2001, Ebner et al 2006. However, to evaluate the capability of the PCR/RFLP described in this paper to detect the different AdV species is necessary to test more AdV reference strains and isolates, since sequencing of the AdV hexon gene has revealed a divergence at protein level of 0.5 to 25.4% among the 51 serotypes (Ebner et al 2005a), and this variability may explain the unexpected RFLP found with the AdV serotype 41 (species F).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Immunotyping methods provide definitive identification of serotype but are excessively time-consuming, labor-intensive, and restricted to a few laboratories that possess reference immune reagents. A variety of molecular methods have been advanced to augment immunotyping, including genome restriction analysis (20), PCR-coupled microarrays (21,22), PCRfragment length analysis (23), electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (24), and more commonly, partial sequencing of specific target genes (25,26). Although an advance over immunotyping methods, these methods require specialized technical skills and utilize technologies that may be of limited availability outside the research laboratory setting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%