2023
DOI: 10.5334/joad.97
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Typological Catalogue of the ancient Roman Scribal Tool Known as a Bone Rule

Abstract: The dataset contains a typological catalogue of archaeological small finds of an ancient device known as a "bone rule" or "bone ruler" or "bone spatula," together with scaled drawing and full metadata for each item in the catalogue. The ancient device has been identified as some type of scribal tool [8,9,13,28,45]. The dataset is assembled from publications; from online resources; and from individual scholars. The PDF Bone_Rules_Catalogue file records all pertinent available information, including find spots, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This contribution was accepted for publication before I had access to Johnson's careful analysis; I incorporated his insights as far as possible.2 The recent catalogue by W.A. Johnson(Johnson 2022;2023a) contains the most comprehensive list of bone strip finds to date (66 items plus several uncertain ones), to which five more finds plus two possible ones can be added: one from Britain (Piercebridge: Eckardt and Walton 2021: 125), one from Germany (Xanten: Jung 2013: 99 cat. no.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This contribution was accepted for publication before I had access to Johnson's careful analysis; I incorporated his insights as far as possible.2 The recent catalogue by W.A. Johnson(Johnson 2022;2023a) contains the most comprehensive list of bone strip finds to date (66 items plus several uncertain ones), to which five more finds plus two possible ones can be added: one from Britain (Piercebridge: Eckardt and Walton 2021: 125), one from Germany (Xanten: Jung 2013: 99 cat. no.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%