“…Some authors have argued that the study of male sexual victimization was relatively neglected until fairly recently (Dhaliwal, Gauzas, Antonowicz, & Ross, 1996;Holmes & Slap, 1998;Romano & De Luca, 2001), although there are important publications that do address this potential bias (Finkelhor, Hotaling, Lewis, & Smith, 1990). Several problems have been considered when examining the rates of sexual abuse of males (Violato & Genuis, 1993), for example, substantially varying prevalence rates (Dhaliwal et al, 1996), the small numbers of sexually abused males who seek professional help for abuse-related difficulties (Holmes, Offen, & Waller, 1997), and lower rates than those obtained among female victims (e.g., Bouvier et al, 1999;Briere & Elliott, 2003;Robin, Chester, Rasmussen, Jaranson, & Goldman, 1997). These confounding variables have resulted in insufficient reporting, recognition and treatment of these samples (for a review of the absence of males in maltreatment research, see Haskett, Marziano, & Dover, 1996).…”