U.S.‐China trade war and competitive advantage of Vietnam

Dhar, Bablu Kumar; Le, Thanh Tiep; Coffelt, Tina A.; Shaturaev, Jakhongir

doi:10.1002/tie.22325

Cited by 10 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 65 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This result slightly deviates from Guo and Luo [ 18 ], but also in conformity with Ha et al [ 19 ]. Moreover the result confirmed other related studies [ 26 ] stating that China has lost competitiveness in labor-intensive industries which includes the agricultural industry as this study result shows, while Vietnam’s competitive advantage in the agriculture trade is stronger than that of China’s.…”

Section: Results Analysis and Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Analysis of the competitiveness and complementarity of China-Vietnam bilateral agricultural commodity trade

Tian,

Zhu,

Hoang

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Vietnam’s agricultural exports to China have remained strong, with the country maintaining its position as the top destination for Agri-products. This article primarily utilizes the Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) Index, and Trade Complementarity (TC) index to examine the trade comparative advantage, and the complementary of twenty major agricultural products between China and Vietnam from 2012 to 2021. The study results showed that Vietnam and China frequently exchange agricultural products. Vietnam has more stronger competitiveness than China in terms of agricultural products. China’s exports to Vietnam were highly complementary to Vietnam’s imports in category 0 whiles Vietnam’s exports to China showed strong complementarity with China’s imports in category 2. This paper analyzes the complementarity and comparative advantages of agricultural trade between China and Vietnam, and proposes informed suggestions for policy-making to promote agricultural trade between the countries. The proposed suggestions aim to expand agricultural trade between the two countries, reduce the trade imbalance, and achieve mutual benefit and win-win results.

show abstract

Section: Results Analysis and Discussionsupporting

confidence: 89%

Analysis of the competitiveness and complementarity of China-Vietnam bilateral agricultural commodity trade

Tian,

Zhu,

Hoang

et al. 2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In 2015, China introduced its Made in China 2025 strategy to upgrade technology comprehensively. Thus this reform led to dramatic increase in the organization affairs (Dhar et al, 2022). In order to ensure the smooth implementation of the change, the organization usually promulgates new organizational policies and systems and establishes new rigorous working procedures.…”

Section: Organizational Change and Work Pressurementioning

confidence: 99%

A Dual Mediation Model for Evaluating the Impact of Organizational Change on Employee Innovation Performance

Shaturaev,

Khakimova,

Fayzullaeva

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Affected by the COVID-19 and the international development pattern, the international environment has undergone profound changes, and enterprises, as the main body of activities rushing in the front line of production and operation and the main battlefield of market competition, are facing various risk challenges in the domestic and international markets. For theoretical research, the impact of organizational change on employee innovation performance has become a key issue in organizational behavior and human resource management research. However, the influence mechanism of organizational change on employee innovation performance is still unclear. In this study, we examine whether, how, and when organizational change increases employee innovation performance in accordance with job demands-resource theory, as well as the effect of work pressure and work engagement on employee innovation performance. Data from 289 employees at three time points are examined. The results show that: (1) Organizational change negatively affects employee innovation performance through work pressure, i.e., work pressure mediates the impact of organizational change on employee innovation performance. (2) Organizational change positively affects employee innovation performance through work engagement, i.e., work engagement mediates the impact of organizational change on employee innovation performance. (3) Organizational identity plays a moderating role between organizational change and work pressure and work engagement, respectively, and there is a moderating effect in the process of mediation of work pressure and work engagement. The findings of this study provide important insights into how and when organizational change influences employee innovation performance.

show abstract

“…Dhar, Le, Coffelt, and Shaturaev (2023) [ 16 ] observed that factors such as the US-China trade war and globalization contributed to the ongoing decline in China's international competitiveness within labor-intensive industries. China's competitiveness saw a sustained downward trend through the latter part of 2020, while Vietnam's competitiveness exhibited a continuous rise.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Modelling trade war between two countries under the international division of Labour

Chen

2024

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

U.S.‐China trade war and competitive advantage of Vietnam

Cited by 10 publications

References 65 publications

Analysis of the competitiveness and complementarity of China-Vietnam bilateral agricultural commodity trade

Analysis of the competitiveness and complementarity of China-Vietnam bilateral agricultural commodity trade

A Dual Mediation Model for Evaluating the Impact of Organizational Change on Employee Innovation Performance

Modelling trade war between two countries under the international division of Labour

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About