2015
DOI: 10.3141/2471-01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U.S. Civil Air Show Crashes, 1993 to 2013

Abstract: This study provides new public health data about U.S. civil air shows. Risk factors for fatalities in civil air show crashes were analyzed. The value of the FIA score in predicting fatal outcomes was evaluated. With the use of the FAA’s General Aviation and Air Taxi Survey and the National Transportation Safety Board’s data, the incidence of civil air show crashes from 1993 to 2013 was calculated. Fatality risk factors for crashes were analyzed by means of regression methods. The FIA index was validated to pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The evacuation decision making during a hurricane is quite complex, requiring to consider different dimensions of evacuee behavior, such as the route choice, evacuation mode, choice of safe destination or mobilization time. There are extensive existing studies along this line and particularly notable are the work by Sadri et al [ 66 69 ] and Hasan et al [ 70 , 71 ]. Since this paper is not about evacuation decision making, but merely documenting the overt behavior (departure time, re-entry time, and location) as evidenced by social media data (tweets), the discussions of the underlying motivations of the route choice, choice of destination, and return time are beyond the scope this paper.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evacuation decision making during a hurricane is quite complex, requiring to consider different dimensions of evacuee behavior, such as the route choice, evacuation mode, choice of safe destination or mobilization time. There are extensive existing studies along this line and particularly notable are the work by Sadri et al [ 66 69 ] and Hasan et al [ 70 , 71 ]. Since this paper is not about evacuation decision making, but merely documenting the overt behavior (departure time, re-entry time, and location) as evidenced by social media data (tweets), the discussions of the underlying motivations of the route choice, choice of destination, and return time are beyond the scope this paper.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ballard and Osario [34] provided new public health data about the U.S. civil air shows. Risk factors for fatalities in civil show crashes have been analysed by using the regression methods.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operation in the tightest airspaces can only be permissible when the safety record of a drone category is equal or superior to manned aerial vehicles (MAVs) (General Civil Aviation Authority 2015). Commercial MAV accidents resulting in at least one fatality are 0.73 per million departures (Boeing 2014), though accidents are far more frequent at civil air shows, with 31 crashes per 1000 shows, of which 16 involve fatalities (Ballard and Osorio 2015). Operational reliability of a specific UAS can only be established once a large number of flights have been logged (Stevenson et al 2015) and is therefore currently very limited due to continued innovation of products, and the absence of a requirement for operators to keep log books of all flights.…”
Section: Safety and Aircraft Delaysmentioning
confidence: 99%