2016
DOI: 10.1089/vio.2015.0043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U.S. Homicides: Multi-Offenders and the Presence of Female Offenders

Abstract: Prior research reveals a clear need to distinguish between homicides committed by solo offenders and those who act with another person. Moreover, as gender is considered in homicides, the dynamics of the offense change. This study examined homicide incidents by several offender combinations that consider gender and number of offenders. We rely on 2006-2010 National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS) data (N = 12,441). The findings indicate that male solo offenders commit the majority of homicides. When of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the variable for female offender was assigned a value of 1 (yes) if all offenders in a criminal incident were female and 0 (no) if there was at least one male offender. Flattening offender sex in this way was appropriate given that the sex composition of group-offender incidents, such as male–female, female–female, or male–male, may affect the seriousness of offending, especially for incidents involving violent crimes (Bell-Holleran & Vandiver, 2016; Cunningham & Vandiver, 2018; Terranova & Vandiver, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the variable for female offender was assigned a value of 1 (yes) if all offenders in a criminal incident were female and 0 (no) if there was at least one male offender. Flattening offender sex in this way was appropriate given that the sex composition of group-offender incidents, such as male–female, female–female, or male–male, may affect the seriousness of offending, especially for incidents involving violent crimes (Bell-Holleran & Vandiver, 2016; Cunningham & Vandiver, 2018; Terranova & Vandiver, 2014).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mass murder research has advanced in recent years to include the use of inferential statistics (e.g., Bell Holleran & Vandiver, 2016;Lankford, 2013Lankford, , 2015; however, research remains limited with respect to offending (particularly with respect to more detailed victim information including age, sex, and relationship to offender), adjudication (e.g., convictions and sentences), and outcome (e.g., suicide or killed prior to trial) patterns in mass murder studies. Most sample sizes are also small, focused on particular types of mass murderers, or limited to the United States (e.g., Langman, 2009;Larkin, 2009;Newman & Fox, 2009;Vossekuil et al, 2002).…”
Section: Current State Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, although more is known about partnered homicide offenses, research remains limited compared with studies on solo male homicide offenders. For example, researchers have explored the need for different theory and interventions, and the role of gender (see, for example, Becker & McCorkel, 2011; Bell Holleran & Vandiver, 2016; Cheatwood, 1993; Conway & McCord, 2002; de Melo Nunes & Baltieri, 2013; Kraemer, Lord, & Heilbrun, 2004); however, studies are limited to qualitative data, short time spans, or rarely include female offenders (see, for example, Clark, 1995; Juodis, Woodworth, Porter, & Ten Brinke, 2009). The dynamics within partnered offending groups are varied, and it is likely that multiple underlying factors feature throughout the course of these criminal relationships.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One viewpoint regarding gendered offending trajectories depicts violent females with psychopathic traits as survivors of trauma and abuse, who often co-offend with male perpetrators (Bauer, Whitman, & Kosson, 2011;Bell-Holleran & Vandiver, 2016). The survival-based theories of female offending are considered feminist or gendered pathways to crime, associated with risk factors such as childhood trauma, low SES, and psychiatric disorders (Jones, Brown, Wanamaker, & Greiner, 2014).…”
Section: Crime and Antisocial Behavioursmentioning
confidence: 99%