2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2009.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U.S. Maternally Linked Birth Records May Be Biased for Hispanics and Other Population Groups

Abstract: Purpose-To advance understanding of linkage error in U.S. maternally linked datasets, and how the error may affect results of studies based on the linked data.Methods-North Carolina birth and fetal death records for 1988-1997 were maternally linked (n=1,030,029). The maternal set probability, defined as the probability that all records assigned to the same maternal set do in fact represent events to the same woman, was used to assess differential maternal linkage error across race/ethnic groups.Results-Materna… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10,11,13 However, because not having a SSN in this analysis is due to the combination of participants not knowing, not having, not being asked (per study protocol) or unwilling to provide it, the percentages in this analysis are substantially higher. Consistent with earlier studies, 9,11,13,26 the higher percentage of estimated missed links provides further evidence -Miller et al that the linkage process may be less effective for the Hispanic population. However, this analysis contributes to the literature by quantifying the expected missed links due to missing SSN, finding that the estimated missed links were almost 90% higher among Hispanic and Asian groups compared with White non-Hispanic, groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…10,11,13 However, because not having a SSN in this analysis is due to the combination of participants not knowing, not having, not being asked (per study protocol) or unwilling to provide it, the percentages in this analysis are substantially higher. Consistent with earlier studies, 9,11,13,26 the higher percentage of estimated missed links provides further evidence -Miller et al that the linkage process may be less effective for the Hispanic population. However, this analysis contributes to the literature by quantifying the expected missed links due to missing SSN, finding that the estimated missed links were almost 90% higher among Hispanic and Asian groups compared with White non-Hispanic, groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Information is classified into three groups: 1) sensitive identifiers (including first and last name, date of birth, date of diagnosis and date of death), 2) epidemiological data (sex, month and year of birth, residential code, diagnosis), 3) linkage identifiers (a set of 22 fields of standardized 3 identifiers and phonetically encoded identifiers).…”
Section: A the Current German Standard For Linking Registriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In practice, either phonetic codes or Bloom filter encodings might be used for the encryption. For efficient blocking and linkage, keyed HMACs for all numerical identifiers (hospital ID, state, sex, 3 The standardization includes reformatting values, removal of special characters, within-word punctuation and professional titles. multifetal sequence number, date of birth and hour of birth) might be considered.…”
Section: B the New Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a statistical point of view, unlinked records result in a missing data problem [7]. If a true link is missed, but the link is crucial for variables of interest, this is referred to as differential linkage error [8], [9]. Hence, a differential linkage error may result in biased estimates of causal effects and population parameters [10], [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%