2023
DOI: 10.1123/apaq.2022-0054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U.S. Physical Activity Para Report Card for Children and Adolescents With Disabilities

Abstract: The U.S. Report Card on Physical Activity for Children and Youth has tracked 10 physical activity (PA) indicators common to the Active Healthy Kids Global Matrix since 2014. This article expands on the U.S. report cards by presenting PA indicator assessments among children and adolescents with disabilities. Grades for indicators were assigned based on a search of peer-reviewed articles presenting nationally representative data. The Global Matrix 3.0 benchmarks and grading framework guided the process. Grades f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Local teams that participated in the Para Report Cards within this special issue were asked to include interpretations related to their report cards' grades, and it was recommended to use a SWOT analysis framework. Specifically, submitted manuscripts from Brazil (Silva & da Silva, 2022), Canada (Arbour-Nicitopoulos et al, 2022), Finland (Asunta et al, 2022), France (Aubert, Verdot, et al, 2022), Hong Kong (Sit, Huang, et al, 2022), Ireland (Ng, Healy, et al, 2022), Israel (Hutzler et al, 2022), Lithuania (Pozeriene et al, in press), South Korea (Lee et al, 2022), Spain (Lo ´pez-Gil et al, in press), and the United States (Stanish et al, 2023) were collated for this synthesis. Documents submitted at the time of auditor review were used for Chile, Philippines (Kang et al, 2022), and Poland.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local teams that participated in the Para Report Cards within this special issue were asked to include interpretations related to their report cards' grades, and it was recommended to use a SWOT analysis framework. Specifically, submitted manuscripts from Brazil (Silva & da Silva, 2022), Canada (Arbour-Nicitopoulos et al, 2022), Finland (Asunta et al, 2022), France (Aubert, Verdot, et al, 2022), Hong Kong (Sit, Huang, et al, 2022), Ireland (Ng, Healy, et al, 2022), Israel (Hutzler et al, 2022), Lithuania (Pozeriene et al, in press), South Korea (Lee et al, 2022), Spain (Lo ´pez-Gil et al, in press), and the United States (Stanish et al, 2023) were collated for this synthesis. Documents submitted at the time of auditor review were used for Chile, Philippines (Kang et al, 2022), and Poland.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some data used to assign grades were not disaggregated by disability status as it was assumed that CAWD live in the same neighborhoods as the general population (López-Gil et al, 2023). Some countries opted to grade this indicator as INC when there were insufficient data on accessibility of environments for CAWD to engage in PA (Arbour-Nicitopoulos et al, 2022;Stanish et al, 2023).…”
Section: Para Report Card Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2014 AHKGA initiated the Global Matrix (GM) – the initiative which aims in preparing and disseminating comparative report cards on PA of children and adolescents from different countries and regions. In the wake of the third edition of initiative – GM 3.0 in the countries such as Finland, 13 Netherlands, 14 Hong Kong, 15 and USA 16 analysis on PA in CAWD was carried out and reported as separate or integrated report. The results obtained from these reports demonstrate consistent patterns; in the majority of the countries surveyed, there is a notable insufficiency of data required for the assessment of established benchmarks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%