2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2015.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U-shaped metallic-yielding damper in building structures: Seismic behavior and comparison with a friction damper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 Bagheri et al performed nonlinear time history analyses on friction damper devices (FDD) added to the 3-, 5-, and 10-story building frames. 19 In their study, the performance of the FDD in reducing maximum base shear of frames was slightly better compared with the U-shape damper.…”
Section: F I G U R E 2 Commonmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…18 Bagheri et al performed nonlinear time history analyses on friction damper devices (FDD) added to the 3-, 5-, and 10-story building frames. 19 In their study, the performance of the FDD in reducing maximum base shear of frames was slightly better compared with the U-shape damper.…”
Section: F I G U R E 2 Commonmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Kaur et al compared the seismic performance of the moment-resisting frames equipped with a friction damper with moment frames and braced moment frames [8]. Bagheri et al assessed the seismic performance of structures with U-shaped dampers and the seismic performance of the frames including U shaped dampers compared to the frames equipped with friction damper [9]. Pall [10], Mualla and Belev evaluated the friction dampers which have been used in various shapes [11].…”
Section: The Effect Of Rotationalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A passive energy dissipation system has been widely used in seismic regions to absorb the input energy of earthquake excitations. In addition, a structural seismic control is commonly adopted to change or adjust the dynamic characteristics of the structure by installing special devices (e.g., seismic isolation bearing [10][11][12]), some other structural modifications (e.g., energy-dissipation braces and joints [13][14][15][16][17], fluid viscous energy absorber [18][19][20], and metallic energy absorber [21][22][23][24]), or additional substructures (e.g., tuned mass energy absorber [25][26][27]) in a certain part of the structure. These devices, which require no additional energy to operate, generate a controlled counterbalance force and provide the ability to improve energy dissipation in structural systems [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%