2011
DOI: 10.1029/2010gc003465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(U‐Th)/He dating of terrestrial impact structures: The Manicouagan example

Abstract: [1] The accurate dating of meteorite impact structures on Earth has proven to be challenging. Melt sheets are amenable to high-precision dating by the U-Pb and 40 Ar/ 39 Ar methods, but many impact events do not produce them, or they are not preserved. In cases where high-temperature shock metamorphism of the target materials has occurred without widespread melting, these isotopic chronometers may be partially reset and yield dates that are difficult to interpret unambiguously as the age of impact. However, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Raw and alpha ejection‐corrected dates are reported in Table S1 in the supporting information, with 2σ errors based on propagated analytical uncertainties only. Further details on NG 3 L procedures are available elsewhere [ van Soest et al ., ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Raw and alpha ejection‐corrected dates are reported in Table S1 in the supporting information, with 2σ errors based on propagated analytical uncertainties only. Further details on NG 3 L procedures are available elsewhere [ van Soest et al ., ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the U‐Pb (Hodych and Dunning ) and (U‐Th)/He (Van Soest et al. ) dating of zircons from the impact melt body, formation ages of 214 ± 1 Ma and 213.2 ± 5.4 Ma have been obtained, respectively. Titanites from central uplift anorthosites have been dated at 208.9 + 5.1 Ma (Biren et al.…”
Section: Geological Setting and Field Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional details of the (U‐Th)/He analytical procedures can be found in Van Soest et al. (). (U‐Th)/He dates were calculated iteratively from blank‐corrected 4 He, 232 Th, and 238 U concentrations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%