2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2005.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

U-Th zonation-dependent alpha-ejection in (U-Th)/He chronometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
322
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 363 publications
(332 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
8
322
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ages were calculated following the methods of Meesters and Dunai (2005), and error was propagated through our analysis to accurately estimate uncertainty in resulting ages. All grains were measured using spatially calibrated photos taken across and down the c axis to calculate alpha ejection correction factors (Ft; e.g., Farley et al, 1996; Farley & Stockli, 2002; Hourigan et al, 2005; Ketcham et al, 2011) using the geometric models of Ketcham et al (2011). Throughout, we take a conservative error estimate of 5% on all Ft values derived from the maximum difference on select problematic grains between our Ft calculation and one modeled with a Matlab script, using a Monte Carlo alpha ejection simulation on 3‐D grain models built from our multiangle photos (Glotzbach et al, 2017).…”
Section: Bedrock Thermochronometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ages were calculated following the methods of Meesters and Dunai (2005), and error was propagated through our analysis to accurately estimate uncertainty in resulting ages. All grains were measured using spatially calibrated photos taken across and down the c axis to calculate alpha ejection correction factors (Ft; e.g., Farley et al, 1996; Farley & Stockli, 2002; Hourigan et al, 2005; Ketcham et al, 2011) using the geometric models of Ketcham et al (2011). Throughout, we take a conservative error estimate of 5% on all Ft values derived from the maximum difference on select problematic grains between our Ft calculation and one modeled with a Matlab script, using a Monte Carlo alpha ejection simulation on 3‐D grain models built from our multiangle photos (Glotzbach et al, 2017).…”
Section: Bedrock Thermochronometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the raw (U-Th)/He ages of zircon and apatite were form-corrected (Ft correction) following Farley et al (1996) and Hourigan et al (2005). Replicate analyses of Durango apatite over the period of this study yielded a mean (U-Th)/He age of 30.4 ± 1.7 Ma, which is in good agreement with the reference (U-Th)/He age of 31.12 ± 1.01 Ma (McDowell et al 2005).…”
Section: Aft Analytical Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farley et al (1996) demonstrated that (U-Th)/He ages typically require correction for the effects of alpha-ejection from crystals. The age-zoned zircons typically show systematic core-to-rim zonation of U and Th that can cause inaccuracy in alpha-ejection-corrected (U-Th)/He ages (Farley et al, 1996;Reiners et al, 2004;Hourigan et al, 2005). In most cases of this study, the rims have higher U and lower Th than the cores.…”
Section: Figure 2 a Continuous Profile Ofmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In most cases of this study, the rims have higher U and lower Th than the cores. Although in general this may cause a bias to younger ages in grains requiring alpha-ejection corrections, it is not likely to exceed ~10% to 15% (Hourigan et al, 2005) because most grains show core-to-rim concentration contrasts of less than a factor of ~2-3, and have opposing Th and U zonation patterns.…”
Section: Figure 2 a Continuous Profile Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%