2018
DOI: 10.2112/si85-045.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UAS & SfM-based approach to Monitor Overwash Dynamics and Beach Evolution in a Sandy Spit

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The variation of these results is far away from the results presented by other authors as James et al [34] whose RMSE had a negligible deviation because of the number of GCPs, obtaining 3.12, 3.57, and 3.59 cm for 5, 10, and 15 GCPs, respectively. Thus, though other authors such as Zimmerman et al [30] found that (7 to 9) wellplaced GCPs in the optimal configuration produced the same magnitude of error as using more (15) poorly placed GCPs, the only acceptable values in our case are those collected by using 10 GCPs, with an IQR less than 3 cm. Moreover, 10 GCPs is just the maximum number of points for this particular case.…”
Section: Influence Of Number Of Gcpscontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The variation of these results is far away from the results presented by other authors as James et al [34] whose RMSE had a negligible deviation because of the number of GCPs, obtaining 3.12, 3.57, and 3.59 cm for 5, 10, and 15 GCPs, respectively. Thus, though other authors such as Zimmerman et al [30] found that (7 to 9) wellplaced GCPs in the optimal configuration produced the same magnitude of error as using more (15) poorly placed GCPs, the only acceptable values in our case are those collected by using 10 GCPs, with an IQR less than 3 cm. Moreover, 10 GCPs is just the maximum number of points for this particular case.…”
Section: Influence Of Number Of Gcpscontrasting
confidence: 50%
“…Thus, the synchronous nature of the data is not lost [14]. Photogrammetry has evolved to the technique called structure from motion (SfM) [13][14][15][16][17] based on algorithms that allows one to obtain excellent cartographic results from a set of frames that cover an area. The emergence of RPAS systems as well as the high definition of today's digital cameras have induced new cartographic systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spring or equinoctial spring tides could have also contributed to the formation of these features in September 2012, October 2014, and November 2015, when they were spotted in the backshore and with similar spacing in the Google Earth satellite imagery (Figure 2b, Table 2). As for the conditions leading to the formation of the features, during summer 2017, the accretionary conditions and the onshore sediment transport led to berm development process in the upper foreshore [42] (see the berm evolution and the formation of a bar in Figure 7a,b), allowing sufficient room for the ulterior formation of both the rhythmic morphologies and a steep beach-face. Their formation was probably linked with spring or equinoctial spring tides and/or longer period waves, processes that may have favored the total water level to reach the backshore.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite several artificial nourishment actions having been undertaken in the northern sector of the spit, it is retreating over the medium-term at an average rate of 1 m/year [35]. Proof of this retreating trend are the presence of outcrops of a peat layer at the foreshore, corresponding to fossil salt marshes, the reactivation of the present washover deposits (even during non-storm conditions) [42], and the presence of human infrastructures in the intertidal area, which were originally placed on top of the foredune several decades ago.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spits are common when the coastline presents abrupt changes and longshore transport has a dominant direction creating a converging sediment zone, e.g., downdrift from a jetty or tidal inlet [3,4]. Sand spit growth and evolution are driven by many factors, including an underlying geological framework [5], wave processes [6][7][8], wave approaching angle [9][10][11], swash bar welding [12,13], tidal currents [13], longshore sediment drift [3,14], and overwash events [15,16]. Each process leads to a specific development (or degeneration, e.g., overwash events) of spit geometric characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%