UAV magnetometer survey in low‐level flight for archaeology: Case study of a Second World War airfield at Ganacker (Lower Bavaria, Germany)

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)‐based magnetometer systems became more and more attractive for large‐scale archaeological prospection in recent years. Although their sensors exhibit the same sensitivity than the ground‐based prospecting systems, UAV prospecting is seriously handicapped by the magnetic and mechanical disturbances of the drone and by limitations of a low‐level flight. To minimize these disturbances, scalar magnetometers are attached only on a tether 2.5–10 m beneath the drone to be flown as close as possible above the ground. First, test measurements with UAV‐fixed fluxgate magnetometers provide more accurate results than the scalar magnetometers in any configuration but have to overcome disturbance by vibrations. Here, we present a case study choosing the compact set‐up of the Sensys MagDrone R4. The high sampling rate of 200 Hz of the three axis fluxgate sensors of the R4 allows sufficient filtering of the interferences generated by the UAV and external disturbances. High‐precision flight control of the drone allows operating the sensors by radar‐controlled flight height ∼1 m above the ground, which is a fundamental and indispensable prerequisite for archaeological prospecting. For our test, we choose the site Ganacker (southern Bavaria), where we expected a large range of archaeological structures and features with high magnetic contrast. We compare and verify the magnetogram with historical and recent geodata. Our results show that the R4 system offers an outstanding step forward regarding a successful application for archaeological prospection. Already now, the system is well suited for the fast mapping of large areas and archaeological sites with intense magnetic anomalies.

War related impacts (WRI) in archaeological magnetometer data

“…The intensity of the anomalies depends primarily on what remains in the crater after the explosion. Several scenarios are possible: if only the heated soil material remains, we see thermoremanent behavior that rarely goes above anomaly intensities of ±50 nT; if we observe anomaly inten-sities above ±150 nT and more, we must expect shock-remanent munition remnants; at anomaly intensities well above ±1000 nT, the presence of UXO is very likely (Stele et al 2022). However, this repeating scheme does not seem to apply to all WRI-3 impacts (see e.g.…”

Is het gras groener aan de andere kant van de heuvel? De studie van mottekastelen vanuit landschappelijk en beheersmatig perspectief’

“…Recente drone-magnetometer surveys (cf. Stele et al 2022;Stele et al 2023, in press) hebben vrijwel geen bodemimpact, en zouden dus efficiënter en in een breder tijdsvenster op akkers kunnen uitgevoerd worden. Dergelijke toepassing van EMI is nog niet gepubliceerd maar de technologie is wel in ontwikkeling (bv.…”

Remotely Sensing the Invisible—Thermal and Magnetic Survey Data Integration for Landscape Archaeology

“…This would potentially allow coverage of a much larger area in a single session and overcome the problem with the swampy terrain (cf. [28,29]).…”