Ubii: Physical World Interaction Through Augmented Reality

Lin, Sikun; Cheng, Hao; Li, Weikai; Huang, Zhanpeng; Hui, Pan; Peylo, Christoph

doi:10.1109/tmc.2016.2567378

Cited by 55 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 42 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In the pie layout, items are placed as a circle around the target at equal distance from the center. The pie layout could offer a novel alternative and potentially more efficient design to be studied, since it is attributed to the capability of short target-seeking time and low error in selection [27]. The reason is that it would support users to have a quicker overview of all displayed items, as the interface consumes greater width but less height.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing Augmented Reality Applications for Personal Health Decision-Making

Gutiérrez¹,

Htun²,

Charleer³

et al. 2019

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Augmented reality (AR) is a technology that can assist with our daily decision-making tasks by presenting information that extends the physical world. However, little work has been done to understand the effect of the layout of AR interfaces on decision-making. In this paper, we present PHARA, an AR-based personal assistant that supports decision-making for healthier food products. In a controlled user study (n=28), we explored the use of four different AR layouts on two different devices: Microsoft HoloLens and smartphone. Using subjective and objective means, we measured their effects on decision-making tasks that occur when people hold food products in their hands. We found that pie and grid layouts perform better on the smartphone, whereas a stacked layout works better on the reduced field-of-view of the Microsoft HoloLens, potentially at the cost of some affordances such as time spent and actions.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Designing Augmented Reality Applications for Personal Health Decision-Making

Gutiérrez¹,

Htun²,

Charleer³

et al. 2019

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…While much research has studied the application of freehand interaction in AR, most have focused on comparing freehand gestures alone [45]. This work has shown that overall a gesture based interaction paradigm can offer ease of access and naturalness to users, and does deliver an intuitive and effective interaction [26,36,40,43,52].…”

Section: Interaction Approachesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Head Mounted Display Interaction Evaluation: Manipulating Virtual Objects in Augmented Reality

Frutos-Pascual

Creed

Williams

2019

Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Augmented Reality (AR) is getting close to real use cases, which is driving the creation of innovative applications and the unprecedented growth of Head-Mounted Display (HMD) devices in consumer availability. However, at present there is a lack of guidelines, common form factors and standard interaction paradigms between devices, which has resulted in each HMD manufacturer creating their own specifications. This paper presents the first experimental evaluation of two AR HMDs evaluating their interaction paradigms, namely we used the HoloLens v1 (metaphoric interaction) and Meta2 (isomorphic interaction). We report on precision, interactivity and usability metrics in an object manipulation task-based user study. 20 participants took part in this study and significant differences were found between interaction paradigms for translation tasks, where the isomorphic mapped interaction outperformed the metaphoric mapped interaction in both time to completion and accuracy, while the contrary was found for the resize task. From an interaction perspective, the isomorphic mapped interaction (using the Meta2) was perceived as more natural and usable with a significantly higher usability score and a significantly lower task-load index. However, when task accuracy and time to completion is key mixed interaction paradigms need to be considered.

show abstract

“…The pairing of virtual and physical objects (Fig. 4) or the pairing of device (Lin et al 2017) are factors to create seamless interaction for MR interfaces (Simões et al 2015).…”

Section: Fig 2 Number Of Publication Through the Yearsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interface of mixed reality: from the past to the future

Chen

Duh

2019

CCF Trans. Pervasive Comp. Interact.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mixed reality (MR) is an emerging technology which could potentially shape the future of our everyday lives by its unique approach to presenting information. Technology is changing rapidly and information can be presented on traditional computer screens following a WIMP (Windows, Icons, Menus, and Pointing) interface model, by using a head-mounted display to present virtual reality, or by MR which the process of presenting information through a combination of both virtual and physical elements. This paper classifies MR interfaces by applying a text mining method to a data base of 4296 relevant research papers published over the last two decades. The classification reveals the trends relating to each topic and the relations between them. This paper reviews the earlier studies and discusses the recent developments in each topic area and summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of the MR interface. Our objective is to assist researchers understand the trend for each topic and allows them to focus on the research challenges where technological advancements in the MR interface are most needed.

show abstract

Ubii: Physical World Interaction Through Augmented Reality

Cited by 55 publications

References 42 publications

Designing Augmented Reality Applications for Personal Health Decision-Making

Designing Augmented Reality Applications for Personal Health Decision-Making

Head Mounted Display Interaction Evaluation: Manipulating Virtual Objects in Augmented Reality

Interface of mixed reality: from the past to the future

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About