1999
DOI: 10.1038/23616
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ubiquitous dispersal of microbial species

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
201
6
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 316 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
7
201
6
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Taton et al 2006) and diatoms (Sabbe et al 2003), and refute the hypothesis that for micro-organisms everything is everywhere (e.g. Finlay & Clarke 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Taton et al 2006) and diatoms (Sabbe et al 2003), and refute the hypothesis that for micro-organisms everything is everywhere (e.g. Finlay & Clarke 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This significant rate of diversity turnover has generally been explained by a dynamic equilibrium between extinction and immigration (''area'' hypothesis, mediated by dispersal) and/or by the increase of habitat diversity with increasing area (''habitat heterogeneity'' hypothesis, mediated by environmental selection) 7 . In microorganisms, phylogeographic studies have revealed that the genetic similarity within particular populations decreases with distance, which suggests a significant influence of dispersal limitation, leading to strong endemism 3 , and contradicts the hypothesis of microbial cosmopolitanism 8 . At the community level, biogeographical studies have indicated that diversity turnover is influenced both by geographical distance 9 and environmental heterogeneity (as classified by soil, vegetation and climatic characteristics) 10,11 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In particular, there is a suggestion that comparatively big animals and, conversely, micro-organisms tend to have large geographical ranges, with smaller animals typically having smaller ranges. Among other things, this raises the question whether the global number of species of organisms less than 1mm long will be vast (as suggested by the rough rule that each tenfold reduction in length increases the number of species of animals one hundredfold, at least down to around 1mm; May 1978), or whether micro-organism species are very widely dispersed, making them ubiquitous and consequently having moderate global richness of species (a view convincingly argued, with supporting data from chrysomonad £agellates, by Finlay & Clarke (1999)). Clearly, these are central questions both for evolutionary ecologists and for conservation practitioners.…”
Section: Relationships Between Species Numbers Sizes Ranges Etcmentioning
confidence: 99%