1965
DOI: 10.1017/s0033822200037310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UCLA Radiocarbon Dates IV

Abstract: The measurements reported in this list have been carried out in the Isotope Laboratory of the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics during 1964. They are a continuation of the previously reported date lists UCLA I, II and III. The same counting procedure has been continued: CO2 proportional counting at 1 atm of pressure in a 7.5 L counter with three energy channels. Dates have been calculated according to the recommendations of the Fifth Radiocarbon Conference, Cambridge, 1962, on the basis of a radioc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…SH zone 1-2 Atmospheric samples Suva, Fiji (18S, 178E;1958-1972 [18] Fianarantsoa, Madagascar (21S, 47E;1964-1972 [1] Pretoria, South Africa (26S, 28E;1950-1972 Berger et al (1965) and Berger and Libby (1966, 1967, 1968, 1969 (1996,1999,2011). Table 1 …”
Section: Atmospheric Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SH zone 1-2 Atmospheric samples Suva, Fiji (18S, 178E;1958-1972 [18] Fianarantsoa, Madagascar (21S, 47E;1964-1972 [1] Pretoria, South Africa (26S, 28E;1950-1972 Berger et al (1965) and Berger and Libby (1966, 1967, 1968, 1969 (1996,1999,2011). Table 1 …”
Section: Atmospheric Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Goslin (1957:42) identified the rind as Cucurbita pepo, but subsequent examination by Yarnell (1964: 103) indicates that it was gourd. Charcoal from a hearth outside the house structure was radiocarbon dated at A.D. 441+250 (C-214, reported in Libby 1965). This date falls within the Middle Woodland period; Baby (1949) and Webb and Baby (1957) consider the Cowan Creek Mound to be Adena.…”
Section: The Archaeological Evidence For Cornmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The article contains a number of factual errors. Further, some dates, but not all, are cited as reports from 14C labs by the senior author and others (Berger et al 1965;Berger and Libby 1966), but some primary sources are not acknowledged. In no case are published reports by the sample submitter credited, although these would lead the reader to important contextual information and technical descriptions of the specimens.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%