1890
DOI: 10.1515/jbnst-1890-0126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uebersicht über die neuesten Publikationen Deutschlands und des Auslandes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

1949
1949
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…34 In Germany the debate on the scientific nature of legal doctrine reached a new culmination point after the adoption of the new Civil Code, which in the eyes of the member of the Freirechtsschule was using legal doctrine as a shield against the legal protection of the working class. 35 The Freirechtsschule paved the way for the integration of social sciences and law. However, the debate went beyond the German particularities and also led to the search for an appropriate legal methodology, one which reaches beyond textual interpretation of cases and statutes in order to integrate social facts in theories and methods of law and legal research.…”
Section: The Wrong Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 In Germany the debate on the scientific nature of legal doctrine reached a new culmination point after the adoption of the new Civil Code, which in the eyes of the member of the Freirechtsschule was using legal doctrine as a shield against the legal protection of the working class. 35 The Freirechtsschule paved the way for the integration of social sciences and law. However, the debate went beyond the German particularities and also led to the search for an appropriate legal methodology, one which reaches beyond textual interpretation of cases and statutes in order to integrate social facts in theories and methods of law and legal research.…”
Section: The Wrong Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…dass die Wertneutralität des DCFR, die jenseits des Status Quo des in ihm zusammengetragenen Rechtsbestandes aus dem Acquis Communautaire und dem PECL liegt, seinem Tool-Box-Charakter entspringt. So bedachte Menger etwa den Entwurf zum BGB mit den Worten: "Vor allem waren die Redakteure darauf bedacht (...) die überaus zahlreichen Partikulargesetze (...) zu sammeln" 100. Es gehört nicht zu dem ihm legitimerweise zufallenden Anspruch, darüber hinaus zu gehen, 92 (selbst wenn seine Verfasser dies gerne so hätten).…”
unclassified
“… Anton Menger felt it his duty to write his socialist critique of the draft code, since he was one of the few learned jurists able and willing to represent the dispossessed (Menger 1890, 2). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%