Abstract:The paper evaluates the impact of the only reform in the Champions Path of UEFA Champions League qualifying system, effective from the 2018/19 season. In contrast to previous studies, our methodology considers five seasons instead of only one to filter out any possible season-specific attributes. The chances of some national champions decrease much stronger than suggested by the reduction in the number of available slots. Since the negative effects depend to a large extent on the arbitrary cutoffs in the acces… Show more
“…Corona et al (2019) follow a Bayesian approach to uncover how the new seeding regime has increased the uncertainty over progression to the knockout stage. Csató (2022b) analyses the impact of changing the Champions League qualification system from the 2018/19 season.…”
Teams and leagues want to optimize their investments by playing a good schedule which seeks to meet various criteria. Good fixtures are important in order to maximize revenues, ensure the attractiveness of the games, and to keep the interest of both the media and the fans." 1
“…Corona et al (2019) follow a Bayesian approach to uncover how the new seeding regime has increased the uncertainty over progression to the knockout stage. Csató (2022b) analyses the impact of changing the Champions League qualification system from the 2018/19 season.…”
Teams and leagues want to optimize their investments by playing a good schedule which seeks to meet various criteria. Good fixtures are important in order to maximize revenues, ensure the attractiveness of the games, and to keep the interest of both the media and the fans." 1
“…A better outcome can be provided by assigning the unknown placeholders according to the highest-ranked remaining team in each undecided contest. The proposed rule is currently used in the qualifications for the European club competitions (Csató, 2022d). The solution chosen by FIFA is detrimental to some national teams, including Ukraine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed rule is currently used in the qualifications for the European club competitions. 6 The solution chosen by FIFA is detrimental to some national teams, including Ukraine.…”
The draw for the 2022 FIFA World Cup has been organised before the identity of three winners of the play-offs is revealed. Seeding has been based on the FIFA World Ranking released on 31 March 2022 but these three teams have been drawn from the weakest Pot 4. We show that the official seeding policy does not balance the difficulty levels of the groups to the extent possible: a better alternative would have been to assign the placeholders according to the highest-ranked potential winner, similar to the rule used in the UEFA Champions League qualification. Our simulations reinforce that this is the best strategy in general to create balanced groups in the FIFA World Cup.
“…A better outcome can be provided by assigning the unknown placeholders according to the highest-ranked remaining team in each undecided contest. The proposed rule is currently used in the qualifications for the European club competitions (Csató, 2022d). It is also absolutely fair if a lower-ranked team effectively takes the coefficient of its higher-ranked opponent after winning against the latter.…”
Wir behaupten aber, daß, wo es auf die Feststellung einer neuen oder einer zweifelhaften Meinung ankommt, ein einziges gründlich dargestelltes Ereignis belehrender ist als zehn bloß berührte. 1
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.