2021
DOI: 10.1109/tim.2021.3102756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UHF-Band Radar Cross Section Measurements With Single-Antenna Reflection Coefficient Results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To suppress undesired reflections from the chamber walls and the fixtures used in this measurement, the chamber without test object was measured using the exactly same experimental parameters, and that background data was coherently subtracted from the measured data with the target placed [2], [3], [27]- [29]. If we denote the complex-valued data with and without the target by E s (k, r 0 ) and E b (k, r 0 ), respectively, the background-subtracted data E s (k, r 0 ) which was to be passed to the NFFFT algorithm is defined as follows:…”
Section: Overview Of the Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To suppress undesired reflections from the chamber walls and the fixtures used in this measurement, the chamber without test object was measured using the exactly same experimental parameters, and that background data was coherently subtracted from the measured data with the target placed [2], [3], [27]- [29]. If we denote the complex-valued data with and without the target by E s (k, r 0 ) and E b (k, r 0 ), respectively, the background-subtracted data E s (k, r 0 ) which was to be passed to the NFFFT algorithm is defined as follows:…”
Section: Overview Of the Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous-wave measurements traditionally measure RCS with a separate antenna for transmitting and receiving [8]. However, if two antennas are unavailable or the mutual coupling between two antennas is too high, a single antenna can be used to measure RCS [9]. RCS has been measured with a single antenna below 10 GHz without quantitative error analysis and at mm-wave with specialized hardware [10], [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed procedures yield an average error of 3.62% for a 3.81 cm diameter metal sphere and 15.3% for a distributed OUT composed of four 2.54 cm spheres. This paper utilizes techniques from [9] and furthers the work by addressing challenges at W-band frequencies, including selecting the proper measurement geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%