2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2022.115090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS assay for quantification of endocannabinoids in cerebrospinal fluid using surrogate calibrant and surrogate matrix approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The variability of the matrix interference results was within 20% RSD for all the NAEs. A study by Aydin et al (26) reported slight ion enhancement using a CSF surrogate which was not the case in our case with human CSF samples.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The variability of the matrix interference results was within 20% RSD for all the NAEs. A study by Aydin et al (26) reported slight ion enhancement using a CSF surrogate which was not the case in our case with human CSF samples.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 74%
“…The LOQ of this method for OEA-d 4 (0.374 ng mL -1 ) was lower in comparison to a previous approach using a similar method (3.62 ng mL -1 ) [24]. The AEA LOQ of 1.07 ng mL -1 in human CSF was reported in another study [1] using a micro-flow LC-MS/MS approach.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the RF is not stable and SILs are used as surrogate calibrants, the analyst should investigate the potential presence of crosstalk interferences such as isotopic pattern overlap or impurities coming from SIL standards [116,117]. The RF can diverge from unit value when SILs containing enriched hydrogen atoms are used, but as long as the unit value of slope parallelism is within 15% acceptance the concerned SILs can be selected as surrogate calibrants [118]. For example, tryptophan was successfully quantified in plasma with a relative bias between − 2.0 and − 8.0 using its deuterated analog, even if the response factor was 0.67 [119].…”
Section: Surrogate Analyte(s) In Authentic Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%