2017
DOI: 10.1177/1750481317714127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ukrainian crisis through the lens of Russian media: Construction of ideological discourse

Abstract: The Ukrainian–Russian conflict of 2013–2017 is characterized as ‘hybrid’ warfare, with a crucial role of informational component. Using ideological discourse analytic tools, this article demonstrates how two prominent Russian TV channels shaped the persuasive message, creating strong unity and mobilizing a high level of support among the national audience. Based on legitimation and de-legitimation patterns, Channel One and Russia-1 built ideologically polarized opposition between ‘Our’ and ‘Their’ sides of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The anti-West rhetoric became dominant in the Russian media in 2014 (Pasitselska, 2017) and attitudes toward the United States and the European Union started plummeting (Levada, 2018b), while attitudes toward immigrant started improving. Support for restrictions on immigration dropped from 78 percent in 2013 to 58 percent in 2017 and agreement with the slogan "Russia for the ethnic Russians" dropped to 41 percent in 2017 compared to 55 percent and 52 percent in 2002 and 2016, respectively (Levada, 2018a).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anti-West rhetoric became dominant in the Russian media in 2014 (Pasitselska, 2017) and attitudes toward the United States and the European Union started plummeting (Levada, 2018b), while attitudes toward immigrant started improving. Support for restrictions on immigration dropped from 78 percent in 2013 to 58 percent in 2017 and agreement with the slogan "Russia for the ethnic Russians" dropped to 41 percent in 2017 compared to 55 percent and 52 percent in 2002 and 2016, respectively (Levada, 2018a).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Legitimation 'justifies "official" action in terms of the rights and duties, politically, socially or legally associated with that role or position' (Van Dijk, 1998: 256). Furthermore, legitimation is prototypically political, a claim that appears to be corroborated by the fact that a large amount of studies on legitimation deals with political issues: campaigns or political parties (Chaidas, 2018;Mackay, 2015) including media involvement in such issues (Hart, 2017;Pasitselska, 2017), discourses of migration (Martín-Rojo and Van Dijk, 1997;Van Leeuwen and Wodak, 1999), or 'the legitimacy of war' (Chouliaraki, 2005: 2;cf. Machin and Van Leeuwen, 2005;Van Dijk, 2005).…”
Section: Legitimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[36]) and riot like The Ukrainian-Russian conflict of 2013-2017 (e.g. [37]). Among the crisis types, managerial misconduct crisis becomes the most studied crisis (n = 34) while riot is the least studied crisis.…”
Section: Types Of Crisis Under Investigationmentioning
confidence: 99%