2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1346-8138.2010.00857.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ulcerating stasis dermatitis of the forearm due to arteriovenous fistula: A case report and review of the published work

Abstract: Stasis ulcers of the upper limbs are rare, and only 30 cases have been reported, all of which were due to rheological abnormalities. A 59-year-old woman sustained an injury to her right upper limb, resulting in incomplete transections of the brachial artery and the brachial vein. Emergent reconstruction of the brachial artery was performed. Raynaud's phenomenon was observed postoperatively, followed by extreme edema, eczematization and the development of ulcers on the forearm. She was referred to our hospital … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 13 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, cellulitis was ruled out by the onset of symptoms approximately one week after vaccination and the absence of progressive reactions during the course of the disease. (2) Stasis dermatitis is usually seen on the lower extremities, while upper extremity stasis dermatitis is reported to be very rare, involving artificial AV fistulas [ 5 ]. This case was also negative because there were no varicose veins on the upper extremities and no venous hypertension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, cellulitis was ruled out by the onset of symptoms approximately one week after vaccination and the absence of progressive reactions during the course of the disease. (2) Stasis dermatitis is usually seen on the lower extremities, while upper extremity stasis dermatitis is reported to be very rare, involving artificial AV fistulas [ 5 ]. This case was also negative because there were no varicose veins on the upper extremities and no venous hypertension.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%