2002
DOI: 10.1006/jsre.2002.6501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ulceration as a Possible Link between Duodenogastric Reflux and Neoplasms in the Stomach of Rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A study from the Arab Emirates showed that 24 of 29 patients with ulcer perforation were HP-positive ( 13 C urea breath test) 8 days after operation, but population data were not available [39]. In an ongoing study in Bergen, Norway, 67% of ulcer perforation patients were HP-positive (serology) at the time of perforation and 37% were HP-positive ( 13 C urea breath test) 8 weeks after ulcer perforation surgery [40]. Thus ulcer perforation seem to differ from uncomplicated ulcer with regard to the importance of H. pylorii infection.…”
Section: Etiology Of Ulcer Perforationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study from the Arab Emirates showed that 24 of 29 patients with ulcer perforation were HP-positive ( 13 C urea breath test) 8 days after operation, but population data were not available [39]. In an ongoing study in Bergen, Norway, 67% of ulcer perforation patients were HP-positive (serology) at the time of perforation and 37% were HP-positive ( 13 C urea breath test) 8 weeks after ulcer perforation surgery [40]. Thus ulcer perforation seem to differ from uncomplicated ulcer with regard to the importance of H. pylorii infection.…”
Section: Etiology Of Ulcer Perforationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a majority of clinical cases, DGR frequently occurs after the surgical interventions (in 52.6 % of cases -after suturing the duodenal ulcer, in 15.5 % of cases -after cholecystectomy). The great number of experimental methods includes techniques, which requires a surgical intervention [17,[25][26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%