Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015) 2015
DOI: 10.18653/v1/s15-2070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ULisboa: Recognition and Normalization of Medical Concepts

Abstract: This paper describes a system developed for the disorder identification subtask within task 14 of SemEval 2015. The developed system is based on a chain of two modules, one for recognition and another for normalization. The recognition module is based on an adapted version of the Stanford NER system to train CRF models in order to recognize disorder mentions. CRF models were build based on a novel encoding of entity spans as token classifications to also consider non-continuous entities, along with a rich set … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such approach can be used to reduce over-generation errors. Since ambiguous concept mention can be mapped to multiple concepts in the referenced ontology (UMLS) depending on the context, one of the main challenges in the concept normalization task consists in the disambiguation of these cases [9]. www.ijacsa.thesai.org…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such approach can be used to reduce over-generation errors. Since ambiguous concept mention can be mapped to multiple concepts in the referenced ontology (UMLS) depending on the context, one of the main challenges in the concept normalization task consists in the disambiguation of these cases [9]. www.ijacsa.thesai.org…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding Concept Indexing, they used basically customized look-ups, like Dictionary look-up (exact match of entity word permutations, LVG), Customized Dictionary lookup (split UMLS entities by function words), and Customized Dictionary look-up (list of possible UMLS spans and application of Levenshtein distance). The second highest ranked team (Leal et al, 2015) obtained, for strict evaluation, an Fscore of 74 and in the relaxed one 76.5. They employed a CRF to identify entities (also discontinuous entities), and for Concept Indexing they applied exact match on the terminology content of the Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine -Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) enriching it with an abbreviation dictionary built on the training set.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For CUI normalization, the best performing teams focused on augmenting existing dictionaries with lists of unambiguous abbreviations (Leal et al, 2015) or by pre-processing UMLS and breaking down existing lexical variants to account for high paraphrasing power of disorder terms (Pathak et al, 2015).…”
Section: Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best-performing teams made use of the large unannotated corpus of clinical notes provided in the challenge (Pathak et al, 2015;Leal et al, 2015;Xu et al, 2015). Teams explored the use of Brown clusters (Brown et al, 1992) and word embeddings (Collobert et al, 2011).…”
Section: Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%