2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ulnar artery versus radial artery approach for arterial cannulation: a prospective, comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…16,148 -152 In a series of 50 patients, Karacalar et al 151 described a 100% success rate of cannulation in patients with strong ulnar pulse and 59% success rate in patients with a weak ulnar pulse without complications. 16,148 -152 In a series of 50 patients, Karacalar et al 151 described a 100% success rate of cannulation in patients with strong ulnar pulse and 59% success rate in patients with a weak ulnar pulse without complications.…”
Section: Ulnar Artery Cannulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16,148 -152 In a series of 50 patients, Karacalar et al 151 described a 100% success rate of cannulation in patients with strong ulnar pulse and 59% success rate in patients with a weak ulnar pulse without complications. 16,148 -152 In a series of 50 patients, Karacalar et al 151 described a 100% success rate of cannulation in patients with strong ulnar pulse and 59% success rate in patients with a weak ulnar pulse without complications.…”
Section: Ulnar Artery Cannulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In one study, the success rate of radial artery cannulation at fi rst puncture attempt with a 22-gauge, 3.1-cm, polyethylene catheter was 64.4% in 45 nonatherosclerotic patients [11]. However, atherosclerotic radial arteries have structural changes attributable to atherosclerosis, such as irregulation, tortuosity, and fragility, as well as the actual disappearance of muscle and elastic fi bers and replacement by fi brous tissue [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by anesthesiologists found a radial artery cannulation success rate of 90%; however, when the pulse was weak, the success rate dropped to 75%. 7 The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention currently recommends that central venous catheters be placed via ultrasound whenever the technology is available. 3 Ultrasound guidance has been shown to reduce complications and increase success rates for bedside clinicians, including respiratory therapists (RTs), during central venous catheter insertion.…”
Section: Radial Artery Cannulationmentioning
confidence: 99%