2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2015.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultimate attainment in bilingual first language acquisition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Delays have been mainly reported for the lexical domain, with a 2L1 child’s vocabulary in either language being smaller than that of monolingual same-age peers and with less accurate performance on rapid lexical retrieval tasks (Bialystok, 2009). But delays have also been found for grammatical gender (see Gathercole and Thomas, 2009, for Welsh; Eichler et al, 2013, for German neuter gender) and for dative case/gender in German (Hager and Müller, 2015).…”
Section: Factors Influencing Child Bilingual Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Delays have been mainly reported for the lexical domain, with a 2L1 child’s vocabulary in either language being smaller than that of monolingual same-age peers and with less accurate performance on rapid lexical retrieval tasks (Bialystok, 2009). But delays have also been found for grammatical gender (see Gathercole and Thomas, 2009, for Welsh; Eichler et al, 2013, for German neuter gender) and for dative case/gender in German (Hager and Müller, 2015).…”
Section: Factors Influencing Child Bilingual Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Studies comparing 2L1 children to monolingual children have generally found that simultaneous bilinguals were not disadvantaged, acquiring the two languages in a similar fashion and at a similar pace as their monolinguals peers (for an overview see Genesee and Nicoladis, 2007). Some studies reported specific acceleration effects, whereas other studies reported delays (see Hager and Müller, 2015, for a discussion of robust and non-robust domains in 2L1 children in comparison to monolingual children of the same language; see Müller, 2017, for a discussion of sources for acceleration and delay). Acceleration has been found for the area of morpho-syntax, with functional elements from the more developed language serving as a bootstrap for the acquisition of the functional elements of the other language (e.g., Gawlitzek-Maiwald and Tracy, 1996).…”
Section: Factors Influencing Child Bilingual Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How does bilingual language experience influence the word reading process? Dual first language learners are exposed to their two languages simultaneously in early childhood, within the sensitive period of brain development for language function ( Hager & Müller, 2015 ; Weber-Fox & Neville, 1996 ). At the same time, two languages housed within a single cognitive system are known to interact ( Chung, Chen & Geva, 2019 ; Petitto, 2009 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other interesting studies went deep into grammar, which includes the complement control acquisition of Mandarin Chinese language [93] and ditransitive verb structure acquisition for Russian and Ukrainian languages [94]. Others discussed language acquisition from different perspectives aside from grammar, such as bilingual first language acquisition [95], discriminate of vowel length for deaf infants [96] and comprehension of 'who' questions among children with hearing loss [97]. The rest of the studies focused on other areas, such as expressive communication skills [21], single-word to multiword speech [98], phonological network influences in children's speech [46], normative database of word production [99], mother sensitivity, cognitive and linguistic stimulation's effect over deaf children language growth [100], phonemic accuracy development in children with cochlear implants [101], children's syllabic words spelling [102], expressive and receptive language role in the recovery or persistence of stuttering [103].…”
Section: ) Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%