2018
DOI: 10.1002/9781119367758
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultimate Limit State Analysis and Design of Plated Structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
201
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
201
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that this assumption was not considering any other possible hazards such as accidental damages and pile related failures. In this study, it was observed that the average corrosion condition relatively simulated the calm waters of Malaysia where the environmental condition is much safer compared to the North Sea region or the Gulf of Mexico [44].…”
Section: Reserve Strength Ratiomentioning
confidence: 89%
“…It should be noted that this assumption was not considering any other possible hazards such as accidental damages and pile related failures. In this study, it was observed that the average corrosion condition relatively simulated the calm waters of Malaysia where the environmental condition is much safer compared to the North Sea region or the Gulf of Mexico [44].…”
Section: Reserve Strength Ratiomentioning
confidence: 89%
“…If P c remains greater than P plt or P stf , failure is assumed to be by stiffener tripping or local plate failure depending on which component load shortening curve peaks first. Paik and Thayamballi (2003) gives a simple equation to estimate peak strength of a combined element (P p-s ) by combining the plate and stiffener strength using the proportional area of each component:…”
Section: Determination Of Inter-frame Local Panel Strength (Step 3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A similar account is presented for the discrepancies between results from the Smith interframe collapse method [14], where the strength data for the stiffened-plate and hard-corner elements may be extrapolated from generic curves stored within the software or bespoke data calculated and input by the user before analysis. However, Paik et al [7] provides a total of six possible failure modes that may exist when considering the failure of a grillage arrangement, whereby the "real ultimate strength is the minimum value of ultimate strengths obtained from the six solutions." [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method maintains the assumption that interframe collapse is the prominent mode of failure of a longitudinally stiffened and transversely framed vessel, originally presented by Caldwell [6]. For progressive collapse analysis of ship hull structures, discretisation is commonly made into an assembly of plate-stiffener combination units [7] rather than the separate plate and beam-column elements commonly used in ISUM [8]. ISUM and ISFEM differ in that ISUM elements are solely based on analytical formulations or solutions, while ISFEM elements are formulated by taking advantage of both analytical solutions and Finite Element algorithms, which is considered to be more useful for modelling more complex structures [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%