2019
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra-deep next-generation sequencing of plasma cell-free DNA in patients with advanced lung cancers: results from the Actionable Genome Consortium

Abstract: Background: Noninvasive genotyping using plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has the potential to obviate the need for some invasive biopsies in cancer patients while also elucidating disease heterogeneity. We sought to develop an ultra-deep plasma next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay for patients with non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC) that could detect targetable oncogenic drivers and resistance mutations in patients where tissue biopsy failed to identify an actionable alteration.Patients and methods: Plasma was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
100
2
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
10
100
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the frequency of mutation in cfDNA, our data confirmed the literature evidences with SNVs in TP53 , PIK3CA and KRAS and CNVs in FGFR3 as the most commonly observed in breast and lung . Our data demonstrate the absence of a correlation with mutation type and primary tumor organ since we identified mutation in 22 different genes among 13 different solid tumors without specific prevalence (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the frequency of mutation in cfDNA, our data confirmed the literature evidences with SNVs in TP53 , PIK3CA and KRAS and CNVs in FGFR3 as the most commonly observed in breast and lung . Our data demonstrate the absence of a correlation with mutation type and primary tumor organ since we identified mutation in 22 different genes among 13 different solid tumors without specific prevalence (Figure ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Regarding the frequency of mutation in cfDNA, our data confirmed the literature evidences with SNVs in TP53, PIK3CA and KRAS and CNVs in FGFR3 as the most commonly observed in breast and lung. 18,19 Our data demonstrate the absence of a correlation with mutation type and primary tumor organ since we identified mutation in 22 different genes among 13 different solid tumors without specific prevalence ( Figure 4). The sniper clones leading to disease progression can be distinguished by cfDNA two-point-NGS analysis pinpointing the needs of grouping patients on truly growing clones instead of on primary tumor organ in clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Release of genomic DNA from white blood cells, resulting in contamination of cfDNA, can be a consequence of delayed processing. The presence of contamination in cfDNA can, however, be accounted for by sequencing white blood cells and filtering somatic mutations attributable to clonal haematopoiesis [73], although this approach will not neutralise the diluting effect of such contamination on the tumour fraction of cfDNA. The necessity of extracting cfDNA from plasma was challenged by a study conducted by Sefrioui et al, The group compared concordance rates in a cohort of 17 mCRC patients and established 93% and 88% mutation detection rates for cfDNA isolated from plasma and crude plasma samples, respectively, suggesting that extraction of cfDNA from plasma may enhance detection by increasing tumour purity [74].…”
Section: Tumour Fraction and Mutation Allele Frequency (Maf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liquid biopsy via circulating tumor cells or cell‐free DNA analysis has value as a more cost‐effective method that is easier to perform and less invasive than currently available approaches (eg, tissue biopsies or imaging scans) for the diagnosis of early cancer, monitoring treatment response, and detecting tumor recurrence . It is important to note that liquid biopsy can be repeated easily when following the patient during or after treatment, allowing for the early detection of minimal residual disease, locoregional recurrence (LRR), and distant micrometastasis (DM) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%