2021
DOI: 10.1002/advs.202101575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra‐Fast Insulin–Pramlintide Co‐Formulation for Improved Glucose Management in Diabetic Rats

Abstract: Dual‐hormone replacement therapy with insulin and amylin in patients with type 1 diabetes has the potential to improve glucose management. Unfortunately, currently available formulations require burdensome separate injections at mealtimes and have disparate pharmacokinetics that do not mimic endogenous co‐secretion. Here, amphiphilic acrylamide copolymers are used to create a stable co‐formulation of monomeric insulin and amylin analogues (lispro and pramlintide) with synchronous pharmacokinetics and ultra‐rap… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The solution was then concentrated using Amicon Ultra 3K centrifugal units (Millipore) and reformulated with glycerol, phenoxyethanol, metacresol, methylparaben, and/or propylparaben in 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH=7.4) at an insulin concentration of 3.45 mg/mL (100 U/mL) (excipient concentrations specified in Table 1-2). For zinc-free formulations glycerol was added at 2.6 wt.% to be consistent with our previously reported monomeric lispro formulations, 18,19,22 however a reduction of glycerol to 1.6% to match Humalog is not expected to affect insulin association states (Figure S1). All other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise specified.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The solution was then concentrated using Amicon Ultra 3K centrifugal units (Millipore) and reformulated with glycerol, phenoxyethanol, metacresol, methylparaben, and/or propylparaben in 10 mM phosphate buffer (pH=7.4) at an insulin concentration of 3.45 mg/mL (100 U/mL) (excipient concentrations specified in Table 1-2). For zinc-free formulations glycerol was added at 2.6 wt.% to be consistent with our previously reported monomeric lispro formulations, 18,19,22 however a reduction of glycerol to 1.6% to match Humalog is not expected to affect insulin association states (Figure S1). All other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise specified.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Further, co-formulation showed an increased overlap of pharmacokinetics with the ratio of AUC of serum pramlintide to Aspart increasing (0.75 ± 0.06) as compared to separate injections (0.47 ± 0.07). Thus, these results demonstrate that developed co-formulation more closely resembled the endogenous behaviour of insulin-pramlintide secretion at meal times (Maikawa, Chen, et al, 2021).…”
Section: Amphiphilic Acrylamide Copolymer-based Drug Delivery Systemssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Due to individual administration of pramlintide and insulin, there is a lack of patient compliance with only 1.5% patients adopting to pramlintide administration owing to discomfort and increased economic strain on the patient (Figure 2) (Maikawa, Chen, et al, 2021). The current form of pramlintide, SYMLIN ® , administered via multiple injections, poses a challenge for patients as it requires twice a day dosing (before meals).…”
Section: Challenges In Pramlintide Deliverymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could make a significant difference especially for patients who use continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (insulin pumps) that allows blood glucose level within the target ranges for a higher percentage of the day. [ 15 ] While insulin analogs have been used to improve absorption kinetics in the clinic, significant research in academia has also focused on polymer [ 21 ] and polypeptide [ 48 ] excipients, polymer conjugation, [ 24 ] and protein coformulation. [ 49 ] While these strategies have shown success in vivo, DESs and ILs offer an appealing alternative since they can easily be manufactured at scale with fewer steps and lower costs to allow for simpler fast‐acting insulin formulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%