To date, few studies have focused on PM air quality in offices, despite the fact that a lot of people spend\ud
many working hours a day in such offices. The aim of the present study is to investigate PM1 and PM2.5\ud
in offices in Milan (Northern Italy) and in the air outside those offices. The PM samples were analyzed to\ud
determine the entity of certain compounds with possible direct or indirect adverse effects on human\ud
health: PAHs, BpA, and water soluble inorganic ions.\ud
A good correlation between outdoor and indoor PM mass concentrations emerged (R2 w0.87). The\ud
maximum I/O concentration ratiowas 0.92, suggesting that the indoor PM levelwas always lower than the\ud
outdoor level. The average infiltration factor, FINF,was 0.55, showing that about a half of the outdoor PMhad\ud
come indoors. The indoor-generated particles, Cig, had values ranging from 0 to 4.4 mg m3 (<25% of the\ud
indoor PM), showing that PM indoor sources had only made a limited contribution to total indoor PM.\ud
The results of the indoor-to-outdoor comparisons for the aforementioned chemical compounds\ud
demonstrate that the offices were characterized by the absence of effective indoor sources of particulatebound\ud
PAHs and inorganic ions, whereas Cig was around 58% of the indoor concentration for BpA. Our\ud
analysis of the FINF data pointed to the presence of a volatilization effect from PM for semi-volatile\ud
compounds like ammonium nitrate and 4- or 5-ring PAHs, which affected the measurement of their\ud
FINF. We propose the introduction of a new and simple parameter, called volatilization correction, to take\ud
account of this effect