2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.precamres.2021.106318
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra-high pressure inclusion in Archean ophiolitic podiform chromitite in mélange block suggests deep subduction on early Earth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, this diamond may have formed during oceanic lithospheric slab subducted to depths where rocks experienced eclogite facies conditions and microdiamonds crystallized from C-rich fluids produced by metamorphic dehydration of slabs. This process is consistent with the formation of UHP minerals hosted in an ophiolitic podiform chromitite mélange from the Neoarchean metamorphic belt of the Central (Taihang) Orogenic Belt, Northern China [156]. We name this kind of microdiamond oceanic lithospheric subduction-type diamond to distinguish it from diamonds categorized as the mantle transition zone-type discovered in fresh ophiolitic mantle peridotite and chromitite.…”
Section: Controversy and Future Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Alternatively, this diamond may have formed during oceanic lithospheric slab subducted to depths where rocks experienced eclogite facies conditions and microdiamonds crystallized from C-rich fluids produced by metamorphic dehydration of slabs. This process is consistent with the formation of UHP minerals hosted in an ophiolitic podiform chromitite mélange from the Neoarchean metamorphic belt of the Central (Taihang) Orogenic Belt, Northern China [156]. We name this kind of microdiamond oceanic lithospheric subduction-type diamond to distinguish it from diamonds categorized as the mantle transition zone-type discovered in fresh ophiolitic mantle peridotite and chromitite.…”
Section: Controversy and Future Perspectivessupporting
confidence: 74%
“…S1 A ). Preserved structural and lithic records of this collision include a series of Archean ophiolitic (oceanic crust and mantle) fragments and tectonic mixtures of rocks known as mélanges ( 19 ), exotic belts of forearc magmatic rocks that preserve Archean subduction initiation sequences ( 20 ), paired metamorphic belts ( 21 ), ultrahigh-pressure (UHP) metamorphic crustal minerals ( 22 ), forearc and accretionary complexes ( 23 ), and Alpine-style subhorizontal arc–affinity nappes emplaced over a continental margin ( 24 ), all of which are diagnostic indicators of asymmetric Archean subduction and large plate translations and analogous to modern subduction at convergent tectonic margins. Nevertheless, the deep subduction of Archean oceanic crust demarked by hallmark vestiges of orogenic eclogites has not been documented in the NCC or anywhere worldwide.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, IOAS forearc mantle typically consists of extremely depleted harzburgite. Fore-arc spinels (chromite), if unaltered, may preserve very significant petrogenetic information (Dick and Bullen, 1984;Kusky and Glass, 2007;Huang et al, 2021), and have high Cr-number (Cr+Al)>0.4, which can be a great aid in interpreting the tectonic setting of ancient forearc peridotites (e.g., Kusky et al, , 2021bHuang et al, 2017;. Understanding the nature of the mantle beneath the arc axis is hindered by the thickness of the crust in this region, but samples can be obtained from xenoliths (Arai and Ishimaru (2007) and are typically spinel peridotites without garnet that show high degrees of mantle metasomatism, forming secondary orthopyroxene replacing olivine.…”
Section: Components Of Intra-oceanic Arc Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Babeyko and Sobolev (2005) suggest that the entire lower crust beneath arcs may behave convectively with crustal overturn facilitating vertical transport of granitoid magmas upwards, and surrounding material downwards (Figure 5), forming the characteristic dome-and-keel structures of continental arcs and some Archean granite greenstone terranes (e.g., the famous domes of Pilbara; . The most common rocks at mid-to deep crustal levels (20-35 km) are mantle-derived melts including amphibole gabbros, horn- Serpentinite plus sediment and metabasalt diapirs likely rise from the subduction channel, bringing additional material from the slab and subducted sediments into the overlying mantle wedge, and may be the source of some arc magmas (e.g., adakites), The diapirs, plus entrained material can in some cases lead to subcrustal relamination, or incorporation of crustal xenocrysts in mantle melts (Kusky et al, 2021b). Mantle wedge corner flow continuously brings new mantle under hypersolidus flow to be metasomatized by the slab-derived fluids (e.g., Zheng, 2019).…”
Section: Crustal Profiles Through Thickened Oceanic and Continental-m...mentioning
confidence: 99%