2002
DOI: 10.2138/am-2002-0708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ultra-high pressure metamorphism in western Tianshan, China: Part II. Evidence from magnesite in eclogite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Qiangtang eclogite lies in central Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, and belongs to low-temperature (C-type) eclogite group according to P-T condition estimate, which is similar with those eclogites reported in Western Tianshan and Northern Qilian [25][26][27] and quite different from those of marginal plateau [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] .…”
Section: Geological Significancesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Qiangtang eclogite lies in central Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, and belongs to low-temperature (C-type) eclogite group according to P-T condition estimate, which is similar with those eclogites reported in Western Tianshan and Northern Qilian [25][26][27] and quite different from those of marginal plateau [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] .…”
Section: Geological Significancesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In the UHP field, the occurrence of coesite inclusions in garnet is of significance because it identifies the possible episodic growth of garnet, which may, combined with garnet isopleth thermobarometry, decipher the P-T trajectory of a specific UHP rock. The first reports of UHP metamorphism in the southwestern Tianshan instigated debate that has continued until the recent discovery of coeiste in the Habutengsu Valley of this orogenic belt [3][4][5][6][7][8]. However, until now, coesite had not been optically identified in the rocks of the Atantayi Valley, where the eclogites involved in the "UHP versus HP" controversy were sampled [5,9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The peak metamorphic temperatures are usually located in the field of low temperature eclogite facies (~600℃) [23] , with the geothermal gradient as low as close to 5℃/km. For instance, the UHP eclogite from Southwest Tianshan, China, experienced lawsoniteblueschist facies, coesite eclogite facies with the peak conditions of 600℃ and 2.8-3.0 GPa [6,7] , and overprinted by epidote-blueschist facies during the retrograde stage. The peak pressure estimated for the eclogite facies of pelitic schist reaches up to 5.0 GPa, indicating the lowest geothermal gradients at about 4℃/km [8] , belonging to the typical cold subduction zone.…”
Section: Metamorphic Charactersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first found the UHP mineral evidences, such as coesite pseudomorphs and relict metamorphic magnesite in the eclogite from Southwest Tianshan [6,7] , which gives rise to controversy [53,21] . Subsequently, we found reaction textures of meta-carbonate [8] and coesite exsolution needle in omphacite [9] , and recently well-preserved coesite inclusions in porphyroblastic garnet were found [54] confirming the UHP metamorphic experienced definitely in this region.…”
Section: Uhp Metamorphic Belt In Southwest Tianshan In Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%